I feel your pain if the public education system tortured you for too few benefits, but here’s some stone-cold facts. I’ve just collected a few resources to help you understand why and how the myth was manufactured.
The initiation should always start with a famous interview with the even more notorious Col. L. Fletcher Prouty
Col. Prouty spent 9 of his 23 year military career in the Pentagon (1955-1964): 2 years with the Secretary of Defense, 2 years with the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and 5 years with Headquarters, U.S. Air Force. In 1955 he was appointed the first “Focal Point” officer between the CIA and the Air Force for Clandestine Operations per National Security Council Directive 5412. He was Briefing Officer for the Secretary of Defense (1960-1961), and for the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
At times he would be called to meet with Allen Dulles and John Foster Dulles at their home on highly classified business. He was assigned to attend MKULTRA meetings. In this capacity Col. Prouty would be at the nerve center of the Military-Industrial Complex at a time unequalled in American History. He has written on these subjects, about the JFK assassination, the Cold War period, and Vietnamese warfare, and the existence of a “Secret Team”. He backs up his his work with seldom seen or mentioned official documents – some never before released. – prouty.org
With Col. Prouty in mind, read all the scientific literature you want from your most trusted sources, and try prove this wrong:
You will always notice a pattern:
– in the “competition” between the abiogenic and biogenic theories, one is “dominant” and the other one answers practical fundamental questions such as, simply put: “Why is there oil where biogenic molecules can’t exist?”
Needless to say that the “dominance” argument is logically fallacious and a cancer to science, as I’ve already pointed out in the opening article for this blog.
<<Goncharov and his colleagues in Russia and Sweden have experimentally shown for the first time that ethane and heavier hydrocarbons can be produced under the pressure and temperature conditions of the upper mantle, the slightly viscous layer of the earth directly below the crust. Their research was published this week in Nature Geoscience.Scientific American
“Our results provide a link which was previously missing or was doubtful because of a lack of in situ measurements … for the upper mantle conditions,” Goncharov said. “Thus, our work suggests there is a possibility for the [abiogenic] oil formation in the deep earth and that there is a potential to find more oil fields than expected if one assumes that oil could be formed only biogenically.”>>
The abiogenic origin of petroleum deposits would explain some phenomena that are not currently understood, such as why petroleum deposits almost always contain biologically inert helium. Based on his theory, Gold persuaded the Swedish State Power Board to drill for oil in a rock that had been fractured by an ancient meteorite. It was a good test of his theory because the rock was not sedimentary and would not contain remains of plant or marine life. The drilling was successful, although not enough oil was found to make the field commercially viable.the Environmental Literacy Council
“Popular science” has lied to us about one more important detail:
The abiogenic theory is not the new “Russian alternative” to the Western Establishment. Quite the opposite. Establishment’s favorite trick is to tell you the truth, just reversed. “War is peace, oil is fossil and scarce”…
“The word petroleum (literally “rock oil” from the Latin petra, “rock” or “stone,” and oleum, “oil”) was first used in 1556 in a treatise published by the German mineralogist Georg Bauer, known as Georgius Agricola” – Encyclopaedia Britannica
“Most geologists agree…”
Geologists weren’t much around when the established science was that oil is mineral – “rock oil”. Both Mendeleev and Berthelot supported this. The biogenic theory is actually the new kid on the block, the immature challenger trying to steal a black belt instead of earning it.
Our popular education has always been about indoctrination and social engineering, look out the Windows.
Our work and existence, as media and people, is funded solely by our most generous readers and we want to keep this way.
We hardly made it before, but this summer something’s going on, our audience stats show bizarre patterns, we’re severely under estimates and the last savings are gone. We’re not your responsibility, but if you find enough benefits in this work…
Help SILVIEW.media survive and grow, please donate here, anything helps. Thank you!
! Articles can always be subject of later editing as a way of perfecting them