In a sane functional society, this would totally dominate the news cycle, even ahead FTX or Arizona!
Election fraud is common, so is money laundering, but the level of fraud here, the ramifications and the genocidal consequences are beyond anything I know of. Except maybe the Plandemic itself.


These are just some highlights of a larger feature which I don’t want to “pirate”, but to push. So Head to EpochTV and help it gain traction and enter the main public debate agenda!

“Why is that important beyond Israel?…Because Israel was essentially the first country to launch [a] national vaccination campaign, and it did that under a very unique agreement with Pfizer that essentially made Israel a worldwide lab for the rest of the world. And indeed, if you follow all the approval stages of the FDA of the vaccine, in each one of them, Pfizer is quoting and relying on data from Israel.”

Prof. Retsef Levi, MIT

BONUS

MIT prof. Retsef Levi: “The real extremism is in the official Covid narratives and policies” 2021

Also my last year’s report:

PFIZER JAB APPROVAL BASED ON ONLY TWO TRIALS ENDING 2023

Other comments seem redundant and superfluous now. But I might add up a few more videos and resources soon.

To be continued?
Our work and existence, as media and people, is funded solely by our most generous readers and we want to keep this way.
Help SILVIEW.media survive and grow, please donate here, anything helps. Thank you!

! Articles can always be subject of later editing as a way of perfecting them

No, you cannot associate Kanye West with Trump any longer, they are divorced forever.

In the wake of the Pittsburgh ‘Tree of Life’ synagogue mass shooting, in October 2018, President Donald Trump demanded that the death penalty be “brought back” for anti-Semites. Only Bolshevik Russia had such a law. 

This evil antisemitic attack is an assault on all of us, it’s an assault on humanity. It will require all of us working together to extract the hateful poison of antisemitism from our world. This was an antisemitic attack at its worst.
The scourge of antisemitism cannot be ignored, cannot be tolerated, and it cannot be allowed to continue. We cannot allow it to continue. It must be confronted and condemned everywhere it rears its very ugly head. We must stand with our jewish brothers and sisters to defeat antisemitism and vanquish the forces of hate. That’s what it is.
And those seeking their [the Jews’] destruction, we will seek their destruction. Now when you have crimes like this, whether it’s this one or another one, or another group, we have to bring back the death penalty. They have to pay the ultimate price. They have to pay the ultimate price.
They cannot do this. They can’t do this to our country. We must draw a line in the sand and say very strongly, ‘Never again’.

Donald Trump, 2018

As Christians For Truth put it:

“Of course, there has never been a death penalty in the U.S. for antisemitism, so it doesn’t seem to make sense when Trump stated that he wanted to “bring it back”, that is, unless you understand what he’s really talking about.

When the Jews invaded and usurped power in Russia during the Bolshevik Revolution, one of the first laws they passed was making antisemitism punishable by death.  This law was necessary because the ethnic Christian Russians began noticing that all the bolshevik revolutionaries were jewish and they spoke Yiddish, not Russian.

Nothing has changed in the last 100 years.  The Bolshevik Revolution continues today under a different brand called “globalism”, but the perpetrators are the same.  And this “alarming” rise in antisemitism that the jewish press rants about literally every day now is a direct result of more and more people waking up to the jewish hand in the nation-wrecking agenda of the Left.

The Jews want the legal option of putting to death anyone who opposes them or even criticizes them.  They don’t just want to silence their critics — they want them dead, and if that means bringing back the gallows of the Nuremberg kangaroo court, then so be it.”

Read more about the shooting and Trump’s rally on Daily Mail.

To be continued?
Our work and existence, as media and people, is funded solely by our most generous readers and we want to keep this way.
Help SILVIEW.media survive and grow, please donate here, anything helps. Thank you!

! Articles can always be subject of later editing as a way of perfecting them

IT DOESN’T MATTER WHICH GOVERNMENT OR OTHER SOCIOPATHIC CRIME SYNDICATE HATES YOUR GUTS FOR READING OUR TYPE OF STUFF, THEY’RE PROBABLY IN SOME EPSTEIN OR MAXWELL BOOKS AND PICS.
SEE DETAILS / ORDER

DON’T LISTEN TO KANYE, LISTEN TO ISRAEL’S ARCHITECTS: THE GREAT RESET AND WOKE REVOLUTIONS THEORIZED OVER A CENTURY AGO

Can you think of a more “authoritative” source than a former head of the World Jewish Congress who also was one of the original architects who built the Israeli state and has a street bearing his name in Jerusalem?!

“Nahum Goldman was was a leading Zionist and the founder and longtime president of the World Jewish Congress. Goldman was born in 1895 in Vishnevo , a shetl in Belarus At the age of six, he moved with his parents to Frankfurt, Germany, where his father entertained leading Zionists

Frankfurt is the home of the Rothschilds ,the Schiffs etc In 1929 Goldman and Jakob Klatzkin started the project Encyclopaedia Judaica, Goldmann never felt that a Jewish state would answer the needs of all the Jews, on the contrary, a strong Diaspora was always a must for the survival of the Jewish state

Nahum had two sons Guido and Michael .Guido founded the German Marshall Fund and the Center for European Studies at Harvard both Globalist organizations furthering his fathers agenda

The German Marshall Fund has “Leadership Programs” which mold young impressionable youth to follow the “Goldmann Protocols” These include

  • Marshall Memorial Fellowship
  • Transatlantic Inclusion Leadership Network
  • Manfred Wörner Seminar

SOURCE

Extended bio at the end of this report.

IF YOU SAY THESE THINGS IN YOUR OWN WORDS, YOU WILL BE ACCUSED OF BEING A BAD PERSON, SO WHY NOT SAY IT IN THEIR OWN WORDS?

excerpts:

Militarism will succeed where propaganda fails
Possibly the first mention of The Borg / Internet of All Things

I hope I enticed you to read the whole thing, it’s tiny.


And for my next number…

PAGE 158 IN THE PDF

more excerpts

“The Russians do not always trust the Jews in ‘positions of responsibility’.
Before the war, most Russian diplomats were Jews. A list of these representatives of the USSR is published every year, and some years ago I asked Robinson, of the Institute of Jewish Affairs, to examine it. Recently it has only contained two or three Jewish names. I took the list to Gromyko and asked why his diplomatic machinery wasjudenrein.
‘That has nothing to do with antisemitism,’ he replied. ‘With a few exceptions you won’t find any Ukrainians there either.
Frankly, we are a closed society, not very democratic in the Western sense of the word. Now if we send a Jewish second secretary to the Russian embassy in Rio de Janeiro, for example,
in his first week he’ll discover that he has a cousin in Sao Paulo, a week later that he has an uncle in Curitiba, and so on. We don’t like that; we don’t want our diplomats to have personal inter¬
national relations. Well, the Jewish people is international through and through. I am not saying that Jews are disloyal, but they have too many friends, relations and acquaintances for our
liking. We take the same line with the Ukrainians, who have several communities living abroad.’

Only one late comment from myself:
If we agree on the fact that the global Jewry wasn’t that troubled by the idea of sacrificing thousands of their own people to achieve higher political goals…
What are the logical consequences?
#1 It’s not that implausible this was part of the plan for Israel from the get go.
#2 It’s even more plausible they seized the opportunity and made “the best of it” as events unfolded.
#3 See WHY WAS HITLER ATTENDING THE FUNERALS OF JEWISH SOCIALIST REVOLUTIONARY KURT EISNER?
I mean, if we flirt with the idea that Auschwitz was cannon fodder for the bigger Israel plan, we have to flirt with the idea that Hitler too was part of the plan. Or, at a bare minimum, a muppet in the plan. He ended up selling Jews to Israel, didn’t he?

Looks like the Balfour Declaration needed a blood sigil

The ramifications are, obviously, much wider, and historians are a shame for not debating this more and for failing to make it common knowledge; enough of them surely know of it, especially the Jewish experts in everything Holocaust.

TEN QUESTIONS TO THE ZIONISTS
BY RABBI MICHAEL DOV WEISSMANDL ZT”L
DEAN OF NITRA YESHIVA AND AUTHOR OF MIN HAMETZAR
(Published by the author in 1948 and reprinted many times)
1.IS IT TRUE that in 1941 and again in 1942, the German Gestapo offered all European Jews transit to Spain, if they would relinquish all their property in Germany and Occupied France; on condition that:
a) none of the deportees travel from Spain to Palestine; and
b) all the deportees be transported from Spain to the USA or British colonies, and there to remain; with entry visas to be arranged by the Jews living there; and
c) $1000.00 ransom for each family to be furnished by the Agency, payable upon the arrival of the family at the Spanish border at the rate of 1000 families daily.
2.IS IT TRUE that the Zionist leaders in Switzerland and Turkey received this offer with the clear understanding that the exclusion of Palestine as a destination for the deportees was based on an agreement between the Gestapo and the Mufti.
3.IS IT TRUE that the answer of the Zionist leaders was negative, with the following comments:
a) ONLY Palestine would be considered as a destination for the deportees.
b) The European Jews must accede to suffering and death greater in measure than the other nations, in order that the victorious allies agree to a “Jewish State” at the end of the war.
c) No ransom will be paid
4.IS IT TRUE that this response to the Gestapo’s offer was made with the full knowledge that the alternative to this offer was the gas chamber.
5.IS IT TRUE that in 1944, at the time of the Hungarian deportations, a similar offer was made, whereby all Hungarian Jewry could be saved.
6.IS IT TRUE that the same Zionist hierarchy again refused this offer (after the gas chambers had already taken a toll of millions).
7.IS IT TRUE that during the height of the killings in the war, 270 Members of the British Parliament proposed to evacuate 500,000 Jews from Europe, and resettle them in British colonies, as a part of diplomatic negotiations with Germany.
8.IS IT TRUE that this offer was rejected by the Zionist leaders with the observation “Only to Palestine!”
9.IS IT TRUE that the British government granted visas to 300 rabbis and their families to the Colony of Mauritius, with passage for the evacuees through Turkey. The “Jewish Agency” leaders sabotaged this plan with the observation that the plan was disloyal to Palestine, and the 300 rabbis and their families should be gassed.
10.IS IT TRUE that during the course of the negotiations mentioned above, Chaim Weitzman, the first “Jewish statesman” stated: “The most valuable part of the Jewish nation is already in Palestine, and those Jews living outside Palestine are not too important”. Weitzman’s cohort, Greenbaum, amplified this statement with the observation “One cow in Palestine is worth more than all the Jews in Europe”.
SOURCE

    Reuters, Aug. 31, 1982

    Credit: The New York Times Archives

    See the article in its original context from
    August 31, 1982, Section D, Page 17

    Nahum Goldmann, one of the world’s foremost Zionist figures, died Sunday night. He was 87 years old.

    Dr. Goldmann was hospitalized here last week while taking a cure in this small Bavarian spa. He was suffering from heart and circulation troubles, but the cause of death was not disclosed.

    In Israel, The World Zionist Organization said Dr. Goldmann would be buried in the plot reserved for Zionist leaders on Jerusalem’s Mount Herzl. The funeral was scheduled for Thursday.

    —- Led Reparations Effort By LINDA CHARLTON

    Dr. Nahum Goldmann was a major figure in Zionism for the last half-century and the chief architect of the pact pledging West Germany to pay reparations to Israel and to individual Jews for acts committed during the Nazi years.

    He was the founder of the Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations and for many years president of the World Jewish Congress, which he helped to organize in 1936. Born in what is now Lithuania and raised in Germany, Dr. Goldmann first visited Palestine in 1913. He became an ardent and active Zionist, which led to his having to flee Germany in 1934. His intense involvement with Jewish issues and with Israel continued throughout his life.

    Last month he created a stir by calling upon Israel to lift its siege of Beirut and to extend official recognition to the Palestine Liberation Organization – a position subsequently repudiated by the executive committee of the World Jewish Congress.

    Dr. Goldmann regarded himself as a diplomat, but successive generations of Israeli leadership found him an irritant, partly because of his outspokenness. He also saw in himself, and particularly in the World Jewish Congress, an alternate voice for Jews around the world, a voice other than that of Israel, in whose establishment he played a major role. Except as it concerned the Jews of the Soviet Union, Dr. Goldmann maintained a basic neutralism in East-West quarrels, a factor that also provoked criticism at times. Warned of Dangers of Nazism

    In a 1981 interview in Le Monde, Dr. Goldmann said the great failure of his life was that ”I failed to convince the Jews of the dangers of Nazism before it was too late,” although he was warning of these dangers as early as 1932. Later he called for a boycott of Nazi Germany by the Western democracies and in 1938 he suggested a five-year plan for the resettlement of most of Germany’s Jews.

    He said that only Dr. Stephen Wise, the influential American Reform rabbi, and a few others had heeded his warnings about Nazism. It was with Dr. Wise, who had created the American Jewish Congress, that he set up the World Jewish Congress. He was president of this group for many years, from 1951 to late 1978. He also served for some years as chairman of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, and was president of the World Zionist Organization until 1968.

    Another regret he expressed frequently was that he had not been able to convince David Ben-Gurion, Israel’s first Prime Minister, to postpone the proclamation of the state of Israel for a few weeks beyond May 1948. He believed that some sort of understanding might have been reached that could have avoided the war with the surrounding Arab countries that followed. ‘As a Child I Was a Zionist’

    In his autobiography, he wrote: ”I can hardly say when I became a Zionist. Even as a child I was a Zionist without knowing it.” Despite his commitment to Israel, he refused to become an Israeli citizen and become part of an Israeli Government.

    ”I wouldn’t have won in Israel,” he said in an interview in Moment magazine. ”And that’s why I declined the invitation to be in the first Cabinet.” But inevitably he became involved in Israeli politics.

    One of Dr. Goldmann’s major convictions was that ”there can be no future for the Jewish state unless agreement is reached with the Arabs.” He said that, like any other politician, he sometimes changed his mind, but that this was ”one stand I’ve always taken since I was 17.” The term ”politician” was one of his own words of self-description; another phrase he sometimes used to describe himself was ”unarmed anarchist.”

    He received a law degree and a doctorate from the University of Heidelberg, and, starting in 1922, was the co-editor and publisher of the 16-volume Encyclopedia Judaica, the first Hebrew-language encyclopedia published in Germany. In 1929, he became a member of the Executive German Zionist Action Committee; in 1934, he became the liaison officer with the League of Nations for the Jewish Agency for Palestine. He moved to the United States in 1940, and served as the agency’s director in Washington, D.C., during World War II. Later he lived in Europe, maintaining a residence in Paris, and in Israel. Negotiated Reparations Accords

    He played a major role in convincing the United States Government to back the formation of a Jewish state by lobbying effectively for partition. ”If things had not gone that way,” he told Le Monde. ”I doubt whether the United Nations would have finally voted for a Jewish state.”

    Of all his accomplishments, one that is certain to be remembered, although it aroused bitter disagreement at the time, was his negotiation of the reparations agreements committing both West and East Germany to pay reparations to victims of Nazism and to Israel. By the beginning of 1982, the amount of reparations paid and anticipated to be paid by West Germany totaled 85.8 billion marks, or $36.3 billion. There were no reparations paid by East Germany.

    Dr. Goldmann had called for reparations as early as 1945; it was 1951 when negotiations with the West German Chancellor, Konrad Adenauer, finally got under way. Even then there were some Jews who felt that neither individuals nor Israel should accept any German money. The first claims were made in October 1953. Efforts at Diplomacy Thwarted

    Twice, efforts at private diplomacy by Dr. Goldmann were thwarted. The first time, in 1956, a private meeting between him and President Gamel Abdel Nasser of Egypt was the victim of the Israeli invasion of Sinai. Then, in 1970, he accused Prime Minister Golda Meir of Israel of having ”torpedoed” another possible meeting with President Nasser. The Israeli Government said he was not a valid spokesman for the nation; President Nasser denied extending any invitation.

    The incident angered some Israelis, and there were protest demonstrations. Dr. Goldmann had not previously been a particularly popular figure in Israel, but the growth of ”dovish” sentiments made his views more widely acceptable.

    Dr. Goldmann was born in Wisnewo, in what is now Lithuania, on July 10, 1895, the son of Salomon Goldmann, a writer and teacher, and Rebecca Kwint Goldmann. They moved to Germany when the boy was young; he went to school in Frankfurt, going on to the universities in Marburg and in Berlin before receiving a law degree from Heidelberg in 1920 and a Ph.D. in 1921. In 1934, he married Alice Gottschalk. They had two sons, Michael and Guido.

    Fluent in six languages, Dr. Goldmann was an inveterate reader who like to consider himself a spokesman for the Diaspora – all those Jews who do not live in Israel. He maintained, as he said in 1964, that Zionists ”do not owe any legal or political loyalty to Israel,” adding that the major objective of Zionism is ”to instill in the Jewish people an attachment to Israel as the great center of Jewish civilization.” Criticism of Israel

    Later, he said that ”in the long term” he was worried about the future of the Diaspora and Israel because of increasing assimilation, mixed marriages and the ”indifference of many intellectuals.”

    But he felt free to criticize Israel, saying in 1981, ”I can only say it pains me to see the discrepancy between the noble ideals of Zionism and the realities of present-day Israel.” Not until Israel was at peace with its Arab neighbors, and a ”neutral state guaranteed by the great powers” – a suggestion he had made previously – only then ”will it really become a spiritual and inspirational center for the Jewish people throughout the world.”

    In 1961, he stumped for the new Liberal Party, attacking Mr. Ben-Gurion’s Mapai Party for its inability to make peace with the Arabs. The next year, after being chided by Mr. Ben-Gurion, he agreed publicly not to speak out on Israeli foreign affairs without consulting the Government. He had angered the Government, too, in 1960, when he suggested that the trial of Adolf Eichmann be held by an international tribunal and not by Israel alone.

    Quite short, with blue eyes, a wealth of silver hair and an aquiline profile, Dr. Goldmann was a devotee of classical music, Bach in particular. He frequently described himself as a ”goy” -the Yiddish word for a Gentile – and explained in the Moment interview: ”What I meant was that I am not stubborn, I am not a fanatic, I am flexible, I understand the other fellow’s point of view, I am tolerant, and that’s not the Jewish character.” The Jewish people and the dream of a Jewish state were, however, the abiding center of his life and work.

    A version of this article appears in print on Aug. 31, 1982, Section D, Page 17 of the National edition with the headline: NAHUM GOLDMANN, A LEADER ZIONIST, DIES AT 87

    To be continued?
    Our work and existence, as media and people, is funded solely by our most generous readers and we want to keep this way.
    Help SILVIEW.media survive and grow, please donate here, anything helps. Thank you!

    ! Articles can always be subject of later editing as a way of perfecting them

    IT DOESN’T MATTER WHICH GOVERNMENT OR OTHER SOCIOPATHIC CRIME SYNDICATE HATES YOUR GUTS FOR READING OUR TYPE OF STUFF, THEY’RE PROBABLY IN SOME EPSTEIN OR MAXWELL BOOKS AND PICS.
    SEE DETAILS / ORDER

    The story of a pyramidal scheme.
    Except elites turned the pyramid on its head.

    Get accustomed with this guy because I’m arming a bigger nuke I dug out from his cellars.

    Dimitri Khalezov

    Mr. Dimitri A. Khalezov, a former Soviet citizen, a former commissioned officer of the so-called “military unit 46179”, otherwise known as “the Special Control Service” of the 12th Chief Directorate of the Defense Ministry of the USSR. The Special Control Service, also known as the Soviet atomic (later “nuclear”) intelligence was a secret military unit responsible for detecting nuclear explosions (including underground nuclear tests) of various adversaries of the former USSR as well as responsible for controlling of observance of various international treaties related to nuclear testing and to peaceful nuclear explosions. After September the 11th Khalezov undertook some extensive 9/11 research and proved that the Twin Towers of World Trade Center, as well as its building 7, were demolished by three underground thermo-nuclear explosions – which earned the very name “ground zero” to the demolition site. Moreover, he testifies that he knew about the in-built so-called “emergency nuclear demolitions scheme” of the Twin Towers as long ago as back in the ‘80s – while being a serviceman in the Soviet Special Control Service.

    Veterans Today

    A HISTORICAL

    This video was shot on 03 of October, 2018 in Bangkok, Thailand.

    PART 1

    PART 2

    THIS APPEARS TO BE THE LAST TIME IT WAS HEARD FROM DMITRI

    I just found this last video, but Dmitri seems to fully acquis to my findings here:

    HAS PUTIN REALLY DEFECTED FROM THE GREAT RESET? I WAS HESITATING, NOT ANYMORE

    To be continued?
    Our work and existence, as media and people, is funded solely by our most generous readers and we want to keep this way.
    Help SILVIEW.media survive and grow, please donate here, anything helps. Thank you!

    ! Articles can always be subject of later editing as a way of perfecting them

    “Nothing I’m telling you here is sci-fi”

    DR. JAMES GIORDANO, 2017

    A FEW TAKE OUTS FROM THE MANY HOURS OF LECTURES AND NEWS BELOW

    • Giordano admits there are nanobots that can take over insects and turn them into “biodrones”.
      But pretty much same thing can be achieved with people, it’s just a matter of complexity.
    • The brain is a battlefield and the drones for it already exist.
    • The brain is as hackable as any cheap tablet, if not more, due to lack of protection.
      They can do that non-invasively, even from the satellite, as we’ve warned you the past two years.
    • From MK Ultra to breaking the fabric of society, neurotechnology has now almost unlimited capabilities.

    Meet Dr. James Giordano, Ph.D., Chief, Neuroethics Studies Prog, Georgetown UMC

    Dr. James Giordano is Chief of the Neuroethics Studies Program in the Pellegrino Center for Clinical Bioethics, and a professor in the Department of Neurology, and Graduate Liberal Studies Program at Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA. He is Clark Faculty Fellow of Neurosciences and Ethics at the Human Science Center of Ludwig Maximilians Universität, Munich, Germany, where he previously was JW Fulbright Foundation Visiting Professor. Dr. Giordano is William H. and Ruth Crane Schaefer Distinguished Visiting Professor of Neuroethics at Gallaudet University, Washington, DC; is appointed to the Neuroethics, Legal, and Social Issues Advisory Panel of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), and is a Fellow of the Center for National Preparedness at the University of Pittsburgh, PA.

    His ongoing research focuses upon the use of advanced neurotechnologies to explore the neurobiology of pain and other neuropsychiatric spectrum disorders; the neuroscience of moral decision-making, and the neuroethical issues arising from the use of neuroscience and neurotechnology in research, clinical medicine, public life, international relations and policy, and national security and defense (for additional information, see: http://www.neurobioethics.org)

    The author of over 200 peer-reviewed papers, and 7 books in neuroscience and neuroethics, Dr. Giordano is Editor-in-Chief of the journal Philosophy, Ethics and Humanities in Medicine; Associate Editor for the journal Neuroethics; and Executive Editor-in-Chief of the book series Advances in Neurotechnology: Ethical, Legal and Social Issues (published by CRC Press). –

    NEUROTECHNOLOGY IN NATIONAL DEFENSE – DARPA’S DR. JAMES GIORDANO @ MAD SCIENTIST CONFERENCE 2017

    BOMBSHELL! 5G NETWORK TO WIRELESSLY POWER DEVICES. GUESS WHAT IT CAN DO TO NANOTECH (DARPA-FINANCED)

    His following lectures are just incremental actualizations to the one before, the backbone is largely similar, but there’s some rewarding gold nuggets to be found in each of them, if you have the patience.
    And I’m going to complement him with some flashbacks from our own reporting.

    The brain is a battlefield populated by nanobots – DARPA’s Dr. James Giordano (2018)

    FOIA RELEASE: REMOTE MIND CONTROL LINKED TO DARPA’S BRAIN MAPPING. IN 2018

    Wireless System can Power and Communicate with Nanotech Inside the Body for Drug Delivery (MIT 2018)
    More info 👉 https://silview.media/2021/05/08/bombshell-5g-network-to-wirelessly-power-devices-guess-what-it-can-do-to-nanotech-darpa-financed/

    “The brain is a battlefield we can hack remotely or populate with nanobots”

    DR. JAMES GIORDANO

    USNA NEWS CENTER

    DARPA’S Dr. James Giordano explains The Havana Syndrome in 2019
    2017_05_11_braing.

    “I can make you like me or more likeable.”

    DR. JAMES GIORDANO

    Dr. James Giordano: Battlescape Brain: Military and Intelligence Use of Neurocognitive Science

      POSTED ON: MONDAY, NOVEMBER 23, 2020 3:02 AM BY THE STOCKDALE CENTER

     This presentation is part of the ‘Brain Science and Effective Leadership Series,’ hosted by the Stockdale Center for Ethical Leadership. Dr. Girordano is with the Georgetown University Departments of Neurology and Biochemistry, working in the Neuroethics Study Program, which is a part of the Program in Military Medical Ethics. He also is a Fellow of the Program in Biosecurity, Technology, and Ethics at the Naval War College. In this invigorating and, at points chilling, talk he discusses various potential uses of neurocognitive science in military and intelligence operations, and sketches ethical issues, and angles of analysis that will arise as both allies and adversaries develop such tools, relating them to existing laws of war and conventions.

    Presentation here:

    DARPA’s “insect Allies” program is a bioweapon warned by experts (2020)

    Mass Neuromodulation is here! Bold New Neuroscience with DARPA’S Dr. James Giordano: (2021)

    OBAMA, DARPA, GSK AND ROCKEFELLER’S $4.5B B.R.A.I.N. INITIATIVE – BETTER SIT WHEN YOU READ

    This investigation on DARPA mind control capabilities gave YouTube a seizure
    Full story:
    – https://silview.media/2021/05/12/magnetogenetics-isnt-this-why-vaxxers-turn-into-fridge-doors-and-magnets-stick-on-them/
    https://silview.media/2021/05/08/bombshell-5g-network-to-wirelessly-power-devices-guess-what-it-can-do-to-nanotech-darpa-financed/

    CNN Interviews DARPA’s Top Neurologist Dr James Giordano Over Havana Syndrome (2022)

    The incredible technological capabilities available for remote mind control – industry insiders REVEAL:

    The incredible technological capabilities available for remote mind control – industry insiders
    Learn more: https://silview.media/2021/05/25/foia-release-remote-mind-control-linked-to-darpas-brain-mapping-in-2018/
    Inbrain is DARPPA-funded
    SOURCE
    Cognitive Electronic Warfare: Conceptual Design and Architecture – 2020
    Graphene Oxide Nanofabricated Ultrasonic Transducers – GO-NUTs
    Optogenetics and the weaponization of light by the Military BioTech Complex
    See more on this topic: https://SILVIEW.media/?s=darpa

    THE INTERNET OF BODIES AKA THE BORG IS HERE, KLAUS SCHWAB SAYS (BIOHACKING P.5)

    Trans-Humanism is evolution engineering – DARPA’S bioethicist Dr. James Giordano

    To be continued?
    Our work and existence, as media and people, is funded solely by our most generous readers and we want to keep this way.
    Help SILVIEW.media survive and grow, please donate here, anything helps. Thank you!

    ! Articles can always be subject of later editing as a way of perfecting them

    Whether you parade for her or against her, I will rain on it.

    If you ditch their narrative just to fall for their counter-narrative, you’re not waking up, you’re barely changing bed side.
    But it’s time to snooze off now.

    This is a little video summary of this report, all the juice is below

    ‘I believe that the existence of Israel is vital and I will make every effort to invest in greater cooperation between our countries’

    Poised to become Italy’s first woman prime minister, Giorgia Meloni speaks with Israel Hayom, saying Putin “crossed a red line” while dismissing the Left’s “ridiculous accusations” of fascism against her.

    Published by Israel Hayom on  9-16-2022 13:33

    'I believe that the existence of Israel is vital and I will make every effort to invest in greater cooperation between our countries'

    Giorgia Meloni, leader of far-right Fratelli d’Italia party, looks on durin | Photo: Reuters / Yara Nardi

    It appears that history is about to be made in Italy: Giorgia Meloni, the 45-year old leader of the national conservative party Fratelli d’Italia (Brothers of Italy), has pledged to fight mass immigration and Islamization and has been very critical of the European Union, is poised to be elected as the country’s first woman prime minister in the parliamentary election in late September.

    Her main rival, former Prime Minister Enrico Letta, the leader of the Democratic Party (PD), has warned that she is a threat to Italians. Her detractors on the Left accuse her of radicalism and affinity to fascist ideas but Meloni − who is spearheading a coalition of right-wing parties − has dismissed this outright. Speaking with  Israel Hayom Meloni lashes out at those who engage in anti-Israel and antisemitic attacks, which are now a common feature in left-wing circles.

    Q: According to the polls, you are about to become the first woman to serve as Italy’s prime minister. Italian society is considered to be very macho. What is your secret?

    “Today’s Italy is somewhat different from the macho stereotype that is still sewn onto it. Nonetheless, it is clear that having a female prime minister would mean breaking that “glass ceiling” that does not enable women to emerge both at institutional and professional levels. I have established myself in a male environment, often feeling that I had to work twice as hard to prove that I was half as good as a man, but in the end, I am proud that I grew up in a political family that chose me as a leader by acknowledging my merits and without any man pushing me forward. That is one of the things that shortcircuits the Left, which has always had nothing to offer but proclamations about the role of women in politics. Then I also had the privilege of being able to be a mother without giving up anything. I will fight to offer the same opportunities to all Italian women by strengthening reconciliation measures and family policies.”

    Q: Do you think women do politics differently from men?

    “Some people claim that I made it because I became as good as a man. I think I made it because I became as good as a woman. And that is exactly what I want to say to women. In the West, we frequently use mandatory quotas as a solution to the problem: on party lists, corporate boards, etc. Rather, I believe that the solution must take into account both merit and opportunity. Opportunity, since a woman should never be forced to choose between her career and her family life in order to demonstrate her worth. Merit, because if the selection is made on merit there are numerous exceptionally good women and there’s no need for quotas.”

    Q: Of all the women, which led their nations − Margaret Thatcher, Angela Merkel, Golda Meir, Indira Gandhi, Benazir Bhutto just to name a few − who inspires you the most?

    “I would like to think that I can get the best from each of them because I always expect a lot from myself, something that pushes me to study hard and constantly try to improve myself. The extraordinary women you mentioned shaped the history of their nations and of their times. They were known and frequently loved and admired around the globe. Regardless of their political views, they all loved and defended their country. This, to me, is what a good ruler should always do.”

    Q: The Italian election is taking place in stormy times: a menacing global economic and social crisis, the war in Ukraine that has no end, tensions between the USA and China over Taiwan, a possible new war in the Middle East around Iran’s nuclear plans. As a future prime minister, what are going to be your priorities?

    “First of all, in the midst of such a storm, you must keep the steering wheel on the starboard side, for us it is Italy’s fundamental European and Western positioning. This is not just a statement of principle, but a choice of the field upon which most of our national policy decisions are based. The most pressing of these is undoubtedly to assist businesses and families in dealing with high energy prices because we will face a severe social crisis in the fall and must do everything possible to avoid it. Only after the emergency has settled, we want to cut labor taxes to boost purchasing power, unleash the forces of our economy, reduce bureaucracy to encourage investment, build tangible and intangible infrastructure, and invest in family policies by getting rid of all those pointless bonuses that fuel welfares but don’t advance the country.”

    Q: The EU establishment and European press consider you as a threat to the European project. How do you foresee future relations between Italy and the EU?

    “In this sense, the Left is putting forward a narrative aimed at doing me a wrong, but it actually paints Italy in a negative light, offering non-existent arguments to those who want to keep Italy on the periphery of the international stage. The truth, of course, is very different. Italy is a great nation that founded the EU, is a net contributor to the EU budget, and has the third largest economy and the second largest manufacturing in Europe. The voice of Italy must count more, and our national interests must be better protected, just as France’s and Germany’s are. Concerning the future of Europe, first the pandemic and now the war demonstrated that the EU was not prepared. For far too long, Brussels has expanded its competencies in several aspects of our daily lives, disregarding the importance of having a common foreign and defense policy, disregarding the importance of ensuring our energy independence, without shortening our value chains, and without bringing strategic productions back home. In this regard, I would like to see a Europe that does fewer things but does them better, with less centralism, less bureaucracy, and more politics. This will be our contribution to the debate about the future of Europe.”

    Q: How would you define your party, The Brothers of Italy (Fdl)?

    “FdI is the party of the Italian conservatives; we support individual freedom, the centrality of the family, the preservation of the Western, European, and Italian cultural identities, as well as self-reliance and private economic initiative and social cohesion. We are a modern European and Western right-wing government, a pillar of the European Conservatives and Reformists Party of which the prime ministers of Poland and Czech Republic are members and which I have the honor of chairing. We also have strong ties to Likud, the British Tories, and the American Republicans.

    Q: Some members of your party come from Benito Mussolini’s family. The party has connections to the National Alliance − which emerged from the Italian Social Movement. What do you say to all those who accuse your party of neo-fascism?

    “These are ridiculous accusations, coming from a desperate Left without arguments. But I don’t want to dodge the question, because I know how delicate it can be to your readers. Fratelli d’Italia is part of the evolving path of the Italian democratic right and since its foundation, it has gathered personalities from other center-right parties, from the Catholic and liberal worlds. Those who, like me, pursue that route, have handed fascism over to history for decades now, firmly condemning the loss of democracy, the outrageous anti-Jewish laws, and the tragedy of World War II. Many of us have previously held government roles; I, myself, was the youngest minister in republican history. We have all sworn the constitutional oath. Everyone knows that we have never been a threat to democracy and obviously we do not become one now, though we are certainly “dangerous” for the power system of the Italian Left, which has been in government for years without winning the elections. The difference between us and them is that I don’t spend my days remembering that, just over thirty years ago, many leftists were members of the strongest pro-Soviet party in the West. It is enough for me to list all the damage made by the left-wing governments today, without having to dig into the past.”

    Q: Where do you see the ideological differences between your party and right-wing Lega (League) party?

    “The League was born as a territorial party that first fought for independence and, in a second phase, greater autonomy for the regions of northern Italy. We come from a national party tradition that pays equal attention to Italy’s north and south. The League temporarily filled the void left by the Right’s decision to merge with former Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi to establish a unified center-right party, the People of Freedom. We progressively regained the values, and consequently the electorate, of the Italian Right when, at the end of 2012, we left that party to create Fratelli d’Italia. We also made efforts to widen our electoral base. In recent years, the League has consented to form a coalition government with left-wing parties and movements, while for us, being an alternative to the Left has always been a political imperative, out of respect of our voters.”

    Q: Have you ever visited Israel? Are you planning to do so soon?

    “Yes, certainly. I was on an official visit to Israel when I was serving as minister during the last Berlusconi government. It was a very significant mission, with the moving visit to Yad Vashem: a conscience-shaking experience. I will certainly return to Israel, hopefully soon. It was something I was considering due to my role as president of the European Conservative Party, of which Likud friends are also members. But the war in Ukraine, the political crisis in Israel, and then the early elections in Italy as well have changed the agenda. I hope to return there as soon as possible, this time as head of government, to discuss together with the new Israeli government about joint collaborations and strategies, starting with those for the supply of natural gas through the eastern Mediterranean Sea.”

    Q: What is for you the importance of a Jewish state?

    “Israel represents the only fully-fledged democracy in the broader Middle East, and we defend without any reservations its right to exist and live in security. I believe that the existence of the State of Israel is vital, and Fratelli d’Italia will make every effort to invest in greater cooperation between our countries. After all, this has been the friendly attitude that the Italian Center-Right has always held towards Israel whenever it has been in government. On the other hand, the Left cannot say the same, not traditionally and neither in this election campaign, which has brought to light repeated incidents of left-wing candidates being caught writing antisemitic-flavored posts on their social media.”

    Q: Do you see a connection between those who call to destroy Israel militarily or through boycotts as a continuation of traditional antisemitism?

    “Yes, and I also think that one of the most common manifestations of antisemitism today is anti-Israel propaganda, which Jews in Europe are most likely to encounter online. Jews in Europe are also subjected to the threat coming not only from Far-Left and Far-Right factions but especially from radicalized Islamic immigrants who feed on resentment with regards to Israel. I recall the recent death of young Jeremy Cohen, who was trying to flee an antisemitic attack in the suburbs of Paris when he was killed by a tram. Because the tragedy would have drawn attention to the failure of integration policies, few European media outlets chose to report it. Therefore, as European Conservatives and Fratelli d’Italia, we strongly support the new European Union strategy against antisemitism. Israel is and ought to continue to be a crucial ally of the European Union in the endeavor to eradicate this evil worldwide. We support efforts to increase young students’ understanding of Jewish history, religion, and culture. This will support the elimination of societal prejudices and the full acceptance of Jewish customs in Europe.”

    Q: Will a government headed by you recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital and move the Italian embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem?

    “This is a very sensitive issue, on which I think the next Italian government, like all those before it, will have to act in synergy with our partners in the European Union.”

    Q: Italy has close economic relations with Iran. How, in your opinion, should the West prevent Iran from becoming a military nuclear power and how can Italy contribute to it?

    “Sanctions have had a heavy impact on many Italian companies that had built strong economic ties with Iran, nevertheless it is certainly not time for second thoughts unless certain conditions are met. Indeed, we are extremely concerned about Iran’s role in the region, its ongoing rapprochement with Russia and China, its continued support for Hezbollah, which continues to threaten Israel’s security, as well as the IAEA’s report indicating that there are insufficient effective controls over Iran’s missile development. Without additional assurances for Israel, which is reasonably anxious about the timing of uranium enrichment required to create the atomic weapon, we believe it will be difficult to revive the 2015 deal. We firmly supported the Abraham’s Accords as a means of maintaining regional stability and curbing down Iran’s aggressive foreign policy; therefore we believe they should be further implemented.”

    Q: How can one stop the war in Ukraine and do you fear a greater war in Europe?

    “The war on Ukraine is not only a blatant violation of international law, an aggression against the territorial integrity of a sovereign nation, and a manifestation of Russian expansionism but an attempt to subvert the current world order to the detriment of the West and for the benefit of communist China. A scenario that Europe must strongly reject. A possible expansion of the war to other Eastern European nations is an eventuality denounced by our Polish friends, which unfortunately we must not underestimate. For this reason, we must not stop supporting Ukraine. Look, I say this firmly but with just as much regret, even knowing the special ties that historically unite Israel and Russia. In 2002, Italy itself hosted a NATO-Russia summit to build an enlarged West and face together the threat brought by Islamic terrorism. Twenty years have passed, that prospect has stalled, and Putin has unfortunately crossed a red line.”

    Q: Should the West and the EU increase sanctions on Russia or should they seek to soften the pressure on Moscow in order to advance a diplomatic solution?

    “The Ukrainian counteroffensive these days demonstrates that the stranglehold exerted by sanctions and the sending of weapons to Kyiv is beginning to work and I do not think it should be loosened. It does, however, raise an issue of the endurance of Europe and the West vis-à-vis the economic and political cost of the sanctions, which clearly impact differently from nation to nation, with some major Western states even enriching themselves from this situation. That is why we have for some time been strongly calling for the creation of a compensation fund, supplied by the EU and NATO countries (the US first and foremost), to support the most vulnerable nations and to prevent Russian propaganda from making its way to the very many people who will have enormous subsistence problems next fall.”

    Q: What is your favorite book? Music? Movies? Food? And do you consider yourself to be religious? 

    “My favorite book by far is J.R.R. Tolkien’s “The Lord of the Rings,” a wonderful tale that is very beneficial for those in politics: It teaches one to put the fate of one’s community ahead of one’s individual destiny, but also not to be charmed by the thirst for power.  As for music, I listen to everything, from rock to classical music. Each chapter of my autobiography is introduced by the quotation of a song: from Ed Sheeran to Adele, passing through two Italian giants such as Battisti and Battiato. My favorite movie is Braveheart, a tale of love and courage that was important for my generation.  I love traditional Italian dishes. Wherever I go I like to eat the local specialty, which is also an important identity factor for each territory.  I am Catholic, I believe in God, and among the Church figures to whom I am most attached is John Paul II.

    Just how ‘far-right’ is Italy’s ‘nationalist’ Giorgia Meloni?

    Special to WorldTribune, July 19, 2022

    Analysis by Joe Schaeffer247 Real News

    We don’t pretend to be experts on Italian politics. Nevertheless, the similarities with fake populist Republicans here in America is unmistakable. The warning message: for a deeply unpopular ruling elite, the best way to remain in power at the moment may be to subvert and control the public backlash roiling against it.

    It would appear odd on the surface that the ruling establishment’s propaganda units seem to be enjoying the rise of “far-right” Italian politician Giorgia Meloni. As big-box stalwart Politico wrote last month:

    Crucial to Meloni’s success is that she represents the traditional nationalist right better than [rival Matteo] Salvini, and that she has remained out of government, said [University of Surrey professor Danielle] Albertazzi. “It doesn’t mean she will be successful three or four years from now,” he added. “But this is her moment.”

    Numerous other outlets are echoing that last sentence: Giorgia Meloni’s time has arrived. This alone should be cause for skepticism. And, indeed, a review of Meloni shows as much red flags flying as can be found with a hedge fund multi-millionaire posing as an America First devotee on this side of the Atlantic.

    For an alleged “far right” fanatical nationalist who smacks of Mussolinian fascism, Meloni has a highly disturbing habit of speaking the international language of globalism.

    Here is how she described her support for the progressive ruling establishment globalist crusade in Ukraine:

    “I am backing this because Italy should not abandon its international allies,” she told [UK newspaper] The Times. “I think Italy should show it is a faithful, solid and credible ally, above and beyond the Ukrainian cause, which I support.”

    The Italian Post quoted her remarks to Italian television station Sky TG24 on the subject in February. This is indistinguishable from what a member of the Biden administration would say in dropping gobbledygook about preserving the “rules-based international order”:

    “I believe that the violation of the territorial integrity of a nation, also European, is unacceptable against which the community must react: this is the position of [her political party] the Brothers of Italy,” said Meloni, referring to what is happening in Ukraine. “Russia is certainly a nation very close to the European dimension on a cultural level, but this does not detract from international law and the fact that Italy, which is part of the Atlantic Alliance, today must firmly, without hesitation, reaffirm that positioning and do everything that can be done to defend international law.”

    Antony Blinken or Jake Sullivan couldn’t have said it better:

    “We are always for respect for the rules and for loyalty with our international allies who are part of the Atlantic alliance. Indeed, our parliamentarians who spoke today signaled that if Italy wanted to be more central, credible and more considered, perhaps it should respect constraints,” continued the leader of the Brothers of Italy, explaining that Italy should contribute more to defense costs as part of its membership of NATO.

    “Far-right nationalists” also are not in the habit of joining internationalist think tanks. Yet Meloni is a member of the notorious Aspen Institute. See picture 3 accompanying this article from The Aspen Institute Italia website.

    Just like a plugged-in RINO here at home, Meloni was invited to speak at CPAC. Italian news site Formiche reported in February 2021:

    Giorgia Meloni, the leader of the right-wing Brothers of Italy party, is on a star-spangled roll. Rumors obtained by Formiche.net say she might participate, either online or in person, to the next Conservative political Action Conference (CPAC) in Orlando, Florida, although her name isn’t on the guest list yet….

    If Ms. Meloni does participate, this latest development is yet another step on the American ladder she has been building for some time. A few weeks ago, she became a member of the Aspen Institute, the powerful and influential American think tank led by the political veteran and academic Giulio Tremonti. The halls of Aspen’s Roman division are crossed by all sorts of heavyweight thinkers and leaders, including [Joe] Biden during his tenure as Barack Obama‘s Vice-President.

    Meloni did speak at CPAC this year, where she stressed a generic need to be “conservative,” oppose “cancel culture” and defend Christmas, while again stating her strong support for “the side of international law.” It’s the RINO GOP primary playbook and Meloni was reciting it word for word.

    Formiche laid out Meloni’s carefully crafted strategy to cement her status in the European conservative mainstream. The pattern should be familiar to anyone who has observed the careerist American conservative politician in his natural element:

    In September 2020, she became chairwoman of the European Conservatives and Reformist party, the 10th biggest European political family. She explained this by distancing herself from her former flat-out Euroscepticism and embracing the idea that she could best defend the Italian’s interests from within the European institutions….

    She is walking a fine line between keeping true to her party’s right-wing ideologies and enhancing them with the international alliances and support that are necessary to become a truly palatable (and effective) global leader.

    The bigger picture emerging is that of an internationally savvy politician, one who has understood the limits of extreme nationalism and anti-establishment positions and who is weaving a global web of influence.

    Ms. Meloni’s strengthening American ties show that she pictures herself as part of the global congress of institutional conservatives, and might also dampen the “anti-institutional” blowback that rejecting the Draghi government might have brought onto her. Her entrance in the Aspen Institute signals that she has dropped the anti-establishment, anti-“powers-that-be” populist rhetoric, and mark her as a trustworthy, well-connected thinking head.

    A May Bloomberg article also touched on the curious gymnastics of the woman whose “party sprang from the ashes of fascism,” as the dominant media outlet so luridly put it.

    Question: Does the world really need a right-wing Tony Blair?

    Meloni is now the only real political star untainted by the machinations of the sistema. She’s learned lessons from the failure of the hardcore euroskepticism of [Marine] Le Pen and Salvini — indeed, she’d distanced herself from Le Pen, well before the French elections. Meloni’s positioned herself as a new type of conservative, calling herself “a right wing” Tony Blair. If that’s confusing, it’s probably intended to be. Many of Meloni’s positions are contradictory. She knows Italy needs European Union funds, hence the softer anti-EU stance. But she remains openly opposed to immigration and against European federalism. An unmarried mother, she presents herself as a defender of Christian, traditional family values.

    Meloni is supposedly ardently pro-life yet she is already wobbling on getting rid of Italy’s notorious Act 194, which legalized abortion in the overwhelmingly Catholic country in 1978, in the wake of Roe v. Wade being overturned in the U.S. MercatorNet reports:

    Meanwhile the leader of Fratelli d’Italia, a right-wing party is hedging her bets. Giorgia Meloni says that she isn’t working for the abolition of Act 194, but rather wants to see its first part, concerning abortion prevention, honored. She also points out that the American situation was very different from Italy’s, where abortion is allowed by a law voted by the parliament and not by a court ruling.

    A stridently anti-right article that appeared in Israel’s Haaretz newspaper in July 2021 convincingly portrays Meloni as a total political opportunist on the gravely important issue of COVID social tyranny:

    Earlier this month, Italy introduced a “green pass” for vaccinated people, a requirement for entry into restaurants, bars, museums and other public venues. Meloni panned it as a move that “limits the freedom of citizens, further devastates the economy and de facto introduces a vaccine mandate.”

    In various tweets she’s called the decision “dangerous and discriminatory” and described the green pass as an “unconstitutional folly” and “the final step on the road to the creation of an Orwellian society.” For the Brothers of Italy, Meloni declares, individual freedom is “scared and inviolable.”

    This is the same politician who, as recently as this March, wrote a panegyric to the green pass idea: “Why doesn’t the EU Commission request an emergency procedure to the EU Parliament to approve the digital green pass? The green pass is the first step to eliminating the obstacles to free movement that have so damaged our economy, especially the tourism sector. It’s a tool that should be implemented as soon as possible.”

    Accused of hypocrisy, Meloni grabbed the goalposts and relocated them. She claimed she supported a different green pass – one that allowed international travel – but that she was against, had always been against, would always be against, a green pass that limits access to venues within the country.

    On this topic, Meloni once again apes the party line language of the progressive ruling establishment:

    In 2018, discussing vaccine mandates, she wrote the following tweet, which has since been deleted, but had been archived by some savvy Italian media observers.

    On vaccines we need to have the humility of trusting the scientific community,” Meloni said then. “I think going back would be a mistake. It’s a topic that must not be dealt with on an ideological level: let those who are competent decide which vaccines are necessary and mandatory.”

    The progressive ruling establishment crosses all borders. Which is to be expected considering its chief aim is to abolish those boundaries to erect its one-world order. Joe Biden, Pierre Trudeau, Emmanuel Macron are all essentially indistinguishable in this regard. Each is the same flavor of servant on behalf of one grand overarching agenda.

    America First advocates therefore should have a keen desire to see populist nationalism thrive in countries around the world. In order to truly oppose that which is being planned, however, authentic representatives of freedom and sovereignty must arise here and abroad.

    Unfortunately, the ruling establishment is all too aware of this fact as well. Controlling the reaction against it is and has always been a powerful weapon in the arsenal of tyranny.

    LATER UPDATE: MELONI IS ALSO AN ESTEEMED MEMBER OF THE ASPEN INSTITUTE, ALONGSIDE THE LIKES OF NANCY PELOSI AND BILL GATES

    “You are the same person who rushed to join the ASPEN INSTITUTE which is the sewer of the worst globalism and the worst speculative international finance. You did not hesitate to assume the presidency of the Conservative Party in the European Parliament.”

    Open letter to Giorgia Meloni, by Prof. AUGUSTO SINAGRA, professor of European Community law at the Faculty of Political Sciences of the University of Rome “La Sapienza”. Attorney before the Higher Courts, in ITALY and the European Court of Human Rights, in STRASBOURG.
    “The Aspen Institute Kyiv actively participated in the organization of the program for the Ukraine House Davos. During a week Ukraine House Davos organized panel discussions, cultural events and networking sessions for the world’s business elite. The conversation focused on panelists’ experience related to leadership roles they play in organizations that are aimed at positive social changes. Ukraine House Davos is powered by co-organizers Ukrainian Venture Capital and Private Equity Association (UVCA), Western NIS Enterprise Fund (WNISEF), Victor Pinchuk Foundation and Horizon Capital.” – The Aspen Institute

    You can’t be free until you freed your mind from the statist religion and break ALL the illusory political chains.

     A modern country is just a slave barrack designed and built by masons for Jewish use.
    Of course you will experience some bonds, quarrels and common history in a slave barrack.
    That doesn’t make it holy.
    Only your best friends, most peaceful people and wisest elders there are worth of praise, not the shack, not the management, not the herd symbols they burn in your mind.

    To be continued?
    Our work and existence, as media and people, is funded solely by our most generous readers and we want to keep this way.
    Help SILVIEW.media survive and grow, please donate here, anything helps. Thank you!

    ! Articles can always be subject of later editing as a way of perfecting them

    Tal Zaks is Moderna’s Chief Scientist.
    The video is from 2017.

    Enough said:

    Want to go deeper?

    MODERNA

    MRNA

    To be continued?
    Our work and existence, as media and people, is funded solely by our most generous readers and we want to keep this way.
    Help SILVIEW.media survive and grow, please donate here, anything helps. Thank you!

    ! Articles can always be subject of later editing as a way of perfecting them

    His silence is a disservice to his people and a service to himself and Israel.

    This is the kind of stuff that doesn’t really need more wordy intros or outros.
    The dots have been joined, you either can handle the truth or you can’t, no 3rd option.

    I cited copiously from following fellow independent truthers, thanks for their efforts:

    Know More News
    SMH Productions


    To be continued?
    Our work and existence, as media and people, is funded solely by our most generous readers and we want to keep this way.
    Help SILVIEW.media survive and grow, please donate here, anything helps. Thank you!

    ! Articles can always be subject of later editing as a way of perfecting them

    So this…

    … caused a bunch of alarmist headlines about the WEF and “poop water”, and they are not wrong, just behind the curve:

    But poop-water’s story goes back more than a decade. By my observations, whatever it is, if it’s happening now, it’s probably been in the works for 2o years or longer.
    This next thing is from 2011 Buzzfeed:

    Why Drinking Purified Poo Water Is So Gross, Even When It Shouldn’t Be

    By Kwame Opam. 8/16/11 7:20PM

    There’s a reason you don’t drink out of the toilet. It’s gross. Even if you got a super toilet that only flushed diamond rain water, it’d still be disgusting. But that’s the thing. The only thing keeping you from drinking cleansed pisswater is you.

    According to NPR, proposals to reuse sewage and turn it into drinking water have been shot down numerous times over the years. And it’s not that the water didn’t meet standards for cleanliness. It would have been fine. Rather, they never got off the ground simply because the idea sounded so nasty.

    And don’t get me wrong. We’ve done it, too. It just has everything to do with a phenomenon called psychological contagion. Remember the episode of Seinfeld when Jerry accidentally knocks his girlfriend’s toothbrush into the toilet? And, after brushing her teeth with it, she forever after had a “taint”? Same deal. The dirtiness of the toilet attached itself to her mouth. So too does the dirtiness of our poop to the water that was cleansed of it. We still think it’s dirty.

    So how do you fix it? More psychology. Scientists found that after making people think about the purified water in an underwater aquifer, they were more apt to drink it. Which is kinda crazy. Just think. You could make me drink actual poo water if you made me think it was mountain fresh, but telling me truly clean water originated in a sewer would make me cringe.

    Moreover, actually putting that thinking into practice would be expensive. Running the water some kind of underground spring just to make you think it’s clean could make it dirty all over again. So then it has to be cleaned again, making the process cost maybe three times as much as it already does. And you’d probably have to pay more for it, too.

    Bill Gates and Jimmy Fallon Drink Poop Water (2015)

    bonus:

    A Texas Town Is Drinking Recycled Pee Water Because of a Drought

    To be continued?
    Our work and existence, as media and people, is funded solely by our most generous readers and we want to keep this way.
    Help SILVIEW.media survive and grow, please donate here, anything helps. Thank you!

    ! Articles can always be subject of later editing as a way of perfecting them

    ORDER