science

by on

by Silviu “Silview” Costinescu

Three magic words: monitoring, control and modeling.
But if you need more, see below:

It’s a “trend”, that’s exactly what this is, I know because I’ve read it in Forbes, top-shelf authoritative source:

The Internet Of Behavior Is The Next Trend To Watch

Emmanuel Ramos, Forbes Technology Council, Mar 13, 2023

The world of technology is changing rapidly, and with it comes the development of new communication protocols like the Internet of Behavior (IoB). IoB offers a revolutionary way to monitor, control and model human behavior. As tech leaders in this ever-evolving industry, we must stay ahead of upcoming trends so that we can take advantage of its many benefits.

The Internet of Behavior

IoB is a system that uses sensors and other technologies to monitor, analyze and predict human behavior. It combines artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML), big data analytics, cloud computing, Internet of Things (IoT) devices, mobile applications, wearable devices, augmented reality (AR), virtual reality (VR), robotics automation systems and more into one comprehensive platform for collecting behavioral data from individuals or groups. The collected data can then be used for various purposes such as predictive analytics or automated decision-making processes.

The primary benefit of using IoB technology is improved efficiency and productivity gains from automation enabled by predictive analytics. Leveraging AI algorithms for analyzing behavioral patterns in real time can help organizations make better decisions faster while reducing costs associated with manual labor or inefficient processes.

The Internet of Behavior is a rapidly growing technology that has the potential to revolutionize how we interact with and understand our world. In this article, I will explore how IoB works and what technologies are used to implement it.

How IoB Works

IoB is a revolutionary technology that enables the monitoring, control and modeling of human behavior. It combines the power of the technologies mentioned above to provide an unprecedented level of insight into how people interact with their environment. IoB has been used in various industries such as healthcare, retail, finance, education, transportation and more.

Protocols And Ecosystems Involved In IoB

IoB works by connecting devices to each other through networks or protocols like Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE). This connection allows for real-time data exchange between different systems, which can then be analyzed using AI algorithms. Additionally, these connections are often secured using encryption techniques like Transport Layer Security (TLS) to ensure privacy protection. Furthermore, this ecosystem also includes software platforms such as Amazon Web Services or Microsoft Azure which enable organizations to store large amounts of data securely in the cloud while providing scalability options when needed.

Technologies Used To Implement IoB

In order for IoB systems to work effectively, they must utilize several technologies, including sensors that detect changes in environmental conditions, communication protocols such as Wi-Fi or BLE, edge computing capabilities that allow for local processing, ML algorithms that analyze collected data, databases for storing information and APIs that facilitate integration with other applications or services. All these components come together to create an intelligent system capable of understanding user behavior patterns over time so it can make predictions about future actions based on past behaviors.

Challenges Of Developing And Implementing IoB

It is important to understand the protocols and ecosystems involved in IoB, as well as the technologies used to implement it, so you can unlock the potential of this powerful technology for improved efficiency, security and accuracy. Let’s explore further how these advantages can be leveraged with IoB for human behavior monitoring, control and modeling.

Advantages Of Using IoB For Human Behavior Monitoring, Control And Modeling

Automation and predictive analytics enabled by IoB can significantly improve efficiency and productivity gains. For example, IoB systems can be used to automate mundane tasks such as data entry or scheduling appointments, freeing up time for more complex activities that require higher-level thinking skills. Additionally, predictive analytics enabled by IoB can help identify patterns in customer behaviors that may not be immediately apparent to the naked eye.

Enhanced security and privacy protection are other advantages of using IoB for human behavior monitoring, control and modeling. Advanced data encryption techniques are used in these systems, which ensure that sensitive information remains secure at all times while still allowing access only when necessary.

The advantages of using IoB in this way have been demonstrated in terms of improved efficiency and security as well as increased accuracy. As the technology continues to evolve, we will see more sophisticated AI-based solutions emerging and greater emphasis on interoperability standards.

Upcoming Trends In The Development And Use Of IoB Technology

The development and use of IoB technology are rapidly evolving, with new trends emerging in the industry. AI-based solutions are becoming increasingly popular for automated behavioral analysis enabled by this technology. These solutions can help to identify patterns in user behavior that would otherwise be difficult to detect manually. This could include identifying potential security threats or uncovering customer preferences and insights from large datasets. Wearable devices are also gaining traction as an alternative to traditional sensors for collecting behavioral data. They offer a more convenient way of gathering information about user activities without having to install additional hardware or software components on the device itself.

Interoperability standards are also being developed with increasing focus, allowing different platforms utilizing IoB technology to integrate seamlessly across different systems and networks. This will enable users to access data collected from multiple sources within one platform, providing a comprehensive view of their behaviors over time while maintaining privacy and security protocols throughout the process.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the Internet of Behavior is a new communication protocol and ecosystem that promises to revolutionize the way we monitor, control and model human behavior. By leveraging the latest advances in technology such as artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms, IoB can provide us with unprecedented insights into how people interact with each other and their environment. As this technology continues to evolve, it will become increasingly important for tech leaders to stay abreast of its development so they can leverage its potential benefits for their organizations. – End of Forbes article

Standard PR piece, ChatGPT redacted, I guess…
But damn worrying escalation from the previous piece on the Internet of Bodies and Internet of Things, or about optogenetics!
And we’re not talking about potential for abuse here because this is an abuse technology, abuse is what it does. With no one’s consent.

I didn’t even bother to check with google, but on any other search engine you get a lot of hits for “internet of behavior”, the secret is hidden in the open, as usual. but I leave you with a few of my own findings and resources, and from here there’s no way around knowing your enemy to escape and defeat your enemy.

The most obvious and effective examples of capitalizing on the Internet of Behaviours are Facebook and Google, which display adverts to surfers at frequent intervals depending on the detailed analysis and understanding they have created from consumer behavioral data obtained on a regular basis.

Precedence Research

More so, a Precedence Research report from past year reveals:

The global internet of behaviors (IoB) market size was valued at USD 402.6 billion in 2022 and is expected to surpass around USD 3592.6 billion by 2032, poised to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 24.97% from 2023 to 2032.

Internet of Behaviors Market Size 2023 To 2032

The Internet of Behaviours (IoB) seeks to debate how data may be best understood and is used to build and launch new products from the perspective of human psychology. The IoB may be utilized in a variety of ways by both public and commercial enterprises. This innovation will become an enticing big branding and distribution platform for businesses and organizations all around the world. Every firm gets an in awareness of its clientele, which the IoB platform enables. For instance, IoB links all mobile phones in the program, allowing them to observe their faults and receive visual tips on how to improve their swinging and stroke. The linking of devices generates a large number of new pieces of data and spans beyond the Internet of Things (IoT). Businesses acquire information from customers by ‘sharing’ data amongst linked devices, which are then monitored in real time by a single computer.

While refers to the interconnection of networked physical things that acquire and exchange data over the internet. IoB interprets this data in conjunction with particular human actions ranging from purchasing habits to demographic preferences. Location tracking, big data, and face recognition devices basically map client behavior. Here’s an easy example: Uber. Its Internet of Things app monitors both drivers with passengers. Once the consumer has been left off, Uber polls to assess the ride, allowing the driver’s conduct to be monitored and the quality of customer to be interpreted properly. By 2025, 40% of the world population would be subject to at least 1 IoB program (government or corporate) and digitally tracked in order to affect human behavior. IoB may be a great instrument for leveraging sales and marketing to develop effective strategies that make a difference in the products and services given to customers. But that’s not all; it’s also beneficial to other industries. IoB, for example, is useful in the medical arena, assisting healthcare personnel in assessing individuals’ illnesses, responsiveness to medicines, and other lifestyle information.

Growth factors

Over the last decade or so, there has been an astonishing increase in chronic and weakens the immune system illnesses (NCDs). Every year, over 41 million individuals die as a result of NCDs, resulting in exorbitant healthcare cost. IoB-enabled devices have enabled significant advancements in artificial pancreas technology. According to 2015 research, IoB devices resulted in a 50% reduction in 30-day hospital readmissions. IoB aids in the reduction of automobile insurance premiums. Users can install an app on their phones that collects crucial information such as distance traveled, automobile speed, and time of day the user is driving, and so on. As a result, determine the right premium that the user is entitled to pay. According to the study, prudent drivers would pay minimal rates. Aviva was the first insurance provider to create a smartphone app for tracking driving behavior in 2013.

Several digital advertising firms are already utilizing analytics technologies to gain insights into regular customer habits. Marketers may utilize the Internet of Things to monitor client purchasing behaviors across platforms, gain access to previously unavailable data, reconfigure the value chain, and even bring honest point-of-sale notifications and customized marketing. IoB is regarded as one of the top technology trends for 2021. The COVID-19 epidemic is mostly to blame for IoB becoming a trend since it has revolutionized how consumers engage with brands, forcing businesses to reconsider how they communicate with customers. From the angle of human psychology, the IoB concept attempts to accurately analyze data and use that understanding to build and market new things. The IoB attempts to understand data obtained from users’ online actions from the perspective of behavioral psychology. It seeks to address questions about how to analyze data and how to apply that information to develop and market new products, all from the standpoint of human psychology. This new approach occasionally has an impact on Quality Infrastructure since many organizations might increase their connectivity.

Using IoB technology has assisted numerous firms in reaching out to more clients through internet advertising. Companies may easily identify and target certain individuals or groups to offer their services and goods using the Internet of Behavior. Google and Facebook, for example, both utilize behavioral data to provide relevant adverts to its customers. Companies may use IoB to not only communicate with their target audience, but also track their habits in order to enhance services. Furthermore, new technologies such as Alexa, OK Google, and Siri are designed to study and analyze data and human behavior in order to perform more effectively.

Report Scope of the Internet of Behaviors (IoB) Market

Report CoverageDetails
Market Size in 2023USD 483.12 Billion
Market Size by 2032USD 3592.6 Billion
Growth Rate from 2023 to 2032CAGR of 24.97%
Base Year2022
Forecast Period2023 to 2032
Segments CoveredApplication, Enterprise Size, Industry, Geography
Companies MentionedAware Inc., Traceable, Guardian Analytics, Vertica Systems, Trifacta, NuData Security, Mazu Networks Inc., Qubit Digital, Cognitive Scale, Capillary Technologies, Among others.


Application Insights

Advertising Campaigns, Digital Marketing, Content Delivery, Brand Promotion, and Others are the market segments. Over the projected period, the Digital Marketing sector is likely to occupy a major proportion of the worldwide Internet of Behaviors (IoB) market. Because the internet of behavior (IoB) requires an internet connection, digital marketing services will benefit greatly from IoB technology. Data is the key commodity of digital marketing, which promotes products and services to consumers all over the world. If companies have access to behavioral analysis and interpretation technology, they will be better positioned to engage customers following the purchase process.

In 2022, the digital marketing category is expected to have the highest share. Because an internet connection is required for the internet of behavior (IoB), digital marketing services will benefit the most from IoB technology. Digital marketing is a field that markets products and services to individuals all over the world using data as its primary commodity. They will be in a better position to contact customers at the conclusion of the purchasing process if they have access to tools for behavioral analysis and interpretation. Globally, there is expected to be a major increase in digital marketing. Digital marketing will be used to promote brands, generate leads, and increase sales. The Internet of Business is a big boon to the sales profession. At the same time, for decades, corporations relied on data to make judgments. Why has the IoB trend become so important in today’s commercial, government, and non-profit sectors? First and foremost, IoB focuses on gathering, analyzing, and comprehending user behavior in order to enhance service quality and the value chain. This technology collaborates closely with behavioral science and can provide greater data insights. It also aids in the development of stronger client connections because IoB allows for two-way contact with them. Instead of doing surveys to learn from them, businesses may better understand their consumers’ demands and deliver significant improvements. 

Industry Insights

BFSI, Telecom and IT, Media and Entertainment, Tourism & Travel, Retail and e-Commerce, Healthcare, Manufacturing, and Others are the major segments. The BFSI category is expected to occupy a considerable part of the worldwide Internet of Behaviors (IoB) market by 2032. IoB is extensively utilized in the BFSI business for statement generation and automatic notification applications. Brands may maintain an omnichannel presence by swiftly determining a customer’s preferred channels and providing tailored messaging solely through those channels. Consumer connection is being prioritized by financial institutions and retail banks through location-based advertising. These reasons are expected to drive IoB adoption in the BFSI industry.

The most obvious and effective examples of capitalizing on the Internet of Behaviours are Facebook and Google, which display adverts to surfers at frequent intervals depending on the detailed analysis and understanding they have created from consumer behavioral data obtained on a regular basis. However, collecting and analyzing data from IoT is difficult, and many businesses do not have simple access to this data. With the number of IoT devices predicted to triple by 2025, IoT, which has so far had momentum in the B2B industry, is expected to experience rapid acceptance in the consumer segment.

Regional Insights

The adoption of the internet of behaviors in North America is expected to rise at a rapid pace. Furthermore, North America has made significant progress in the use of IoT, particularly in the industrial and automotive industries. Because of the demand for IoT, cloud platforms are seeing widespread acceptance, boosting the growth of the internet of behaviors market throughout the forecast period.

South Asia and the Pacific are expected to emerge as the most opportunistic markets for the internet of behaviors due to the presence of a large consumer population, creating opportunities for organizations engaged in behavioral analytics to better understand consumer behavior and strategize their sales/marketing campaigns accordingly. Furthermore, rising government smart city efforts and cloud investment in the area are expected to fuel market expansion in the near future. Furthermore, the introduction of high-speed networking technologies, increased interest in the area by international firms, and rising demand from developing countries such as India, Indonesia, and Australia are expected to boost market expansion.

Key market developments

Aware, Inc., a major global provider of biometrics software products, solutions, and services, will exhibit its digital identification expertise in many sessions at the Identity Week London 2021 conference, which will be held from September 22 to 23 in London, England. Identity Week London is an ideal venue for Aware to showcase its extensive biometric expertise and solutions for password-less authentication and identity ownership, with a focus on digital identity and complex authentication technologies.

Maxar Technologies’ AFIXTM suite of biometric products was bought by Aware, Inc., a prominent global provider of biometrics software products, solutions, and services, in November 2020. The Aware ABIS product line has expanded with the inclusion of AFIX, which provide turn key also face and fingerprint biometrics matching, in addition forensic analysis softwares for small and medium-sized law enforcement and government organizations.

Key market players

  • Aware Inc.
  • Traceable
  • Guardian Analytics
  • Vertica Systems
  • Trifacta
  • NuData Security
  • Mazu Networks Inc.
  • Qubit Digital
  • Cognitive Scale
  • Capillary Technologies

Combined Impact of IoB and IoT

Internet of behaviour is an extension of IoT. Let us try to know more about it. It’s not about the “things” at all when companies use the Internet of Things to persuade us to change our habits. We’ve crossed over into the Internet of Behavior as the IoT connects individuals with their activities. 

Consider the IoB as a mash-up of three disciplines:

  • Technology
  • Analytical data
  • Psychology is the study of human behaviour.

Emotions, choices, augmentations, and companionship are the four areas of behavioural science that we examine when we utilize technology.

Companies that know us through the data provided by IoT, can now influence our behaviour using the data provided by IoB. Consider using a smartphone health app to check your nutrition, sleep habits, heart rate, or blood sugar levels. The app can warn you about potentially dangerous circumstances and propose behaviour changes that would lead to a more positive or desirable outcome.

For the time being, corporations are mostly using IoT and IoB to watch and attempt to influence our behaviour to reach Allstate behavior their intended goal—typically, to purchase.

Working of IoB

  1. How Data Is Collected?

Consumer data may be gathered from a range of sites and technologies, including a company’s website, social media profiles, sensors, telematics, beacons, health monitors (such as Fitbit), and a variety of other devices.

Each of these sites gathers various types of information. For example, a website may keep track of how many times a person visits a certain page or how long they remain on it. Furthermore, telematics may track how hard a vehicle’s driver brakes or the vehicle’s typical speed.

( How is IoT influencing the Human Body?)

  1. What Happens to the Information Gathered?

Data is collected and analyzed by businesses for a variety of purposes. These reasons include assisting businesses in making educated business decisions, customizing marketing techniques, developing products and services, and driving user experience design, among others.

Companies establish standards to aid in the analysis of this data. When a user performs a specific action(s), the firm then begins to convince the user to modify their behaviour. For instance, if a user visits a company’s page selling men’s slim jeans three times, the digital shop may show them a pop-up ad offering them 25% off a pair of jeans.

  1. Using Data from a Variety of Sources

Combining data from many sources and evaluating it to make a decision is another component of the Internet of Behaviors. Companies may develop in-depth user profiles for each user by combining data from a variety of sources. These profiles may then be looked at to see what the best course of action is for the person.

For example, on the brand’s Instagram page, a customer called Ted comments on a photo of a new sneaker. Ted visits the brand’s website a few days later and looks at the identical sneaker. After a week, Ted is watching an ad for the sneaker on YouTube. In the meanwhile, the brand is keeping track of all of Ted’s digital content touchpoints. 

Because Ted has expressed an interest in the brand’s shoe, the brand may synthesize this information and devise a strategy for converting Ted into a customer. Remarketing display advertising or emailing Ted a discount coupon are examples of actions the brand might do.

Use of IoB in Various Sectors

  1. IoB in Business

Online advertising is increasingly being used by a variety of businesses to reach out to their clients. They may discover and target certain persons or groups that could benefit from their products or services with the help of IoB.

Both Google and Facebook utilize behavioural data to provide ads to users on their sites. This enables companies to interact with their target consumers and measure their behaviour in response to advertisements via “click rates.”

Similarly, Youtube uses behavioural analytics to enhance the viewer’s experience by only recommending or highlighting videos and subjects that they are interested in.

  1. IoB During the Covid-19 Pandemic

The epidemic has increased our awareness of the precautions we must take during this period. Employers might use sensors or RFID tags to see if there are any inconsistencies in following safety standards. Restaurants and food delivery applications, for example, utilize the protocol information to guide their decisions.

Swiggy and Zomato, for example, both exhibited and promoted restaurant safety procedures. They also recorded and broadcast the temperature of the delivery person to reassure consumers that they were safe.

  1. IoB for the Insurance Industry

In the insurance industry, IoB may be quite beneficial. Driver tracking tools are already used by insurance companies like Allstate and StateFarm to track and secure a driver’s conduct. With the help of IoB, they may evaluate the behaviour and perhaps determine if a certain occurrence was an accident or a misjudged assumption on the part of the insured.

This can help prevent incidents of drunk driving, driving under the influence of drugs, and even underage or retired persons from getting behind the wheel and causing an accident.

End-Note

The Internet of Behaviors offers businesses cutting-edge methods for marketing products and services as well as influencing user and employee behaviour. This technology is highly useful to organizations since it allows them to optimize their customer relationships depending on the data acquired. 

Behavioral data technology is still developing. However, as new IoT devices proliferate, the argument over what constitutes critical data and ethical use is only beginning.

internet-of-behavior-surveyDownload

If it’s about sales and customer service, of course India has been at the forefront of it:

iobe-indiaDownload

Very related, from our vault:

THE INTERNET OF BODIES AKA THE BORG IS HERE, KLAUS SCHWAB SAYS (BIOHACKING P.5)

Optogenetics and the weaponization of light by the Military BioTech Complex

To be continued?
Our work and existence, as media and people, is funded solely by our most generous supporters. But we’re not really covering our costs so far, and we’re in dire needs to upgrade our equipment, especially for video production.
Help SILVIEW.media survive and grow, please donate here, anything helps. Thank you!

! Articles can always be subject of later editing as a way of perfecting them

! Articles can always be subject of later editing as a way of perfecting them

ORDER

by on

by Silviu “Silview” Costinescu

If it walks like graphene and quacks like graphene, you don’t even need to name the graphene

Neural electrodes are used for acquiring neuron signals in brain-machine interfaces, and they are crucial for next-generation neuron engineering and related medical applications. Thus, developing flexible, stable and high-resolution neural electrodes will play an important role in stimulation, acquisition, recording and analysis of signals. Compared with traditional metallic electrodes, electrodes based on graphene and other two-dimensional materials have attracted wide attention in electrophysiological recording and stimulation due to their excellent physical properties such as unique flexibility, low resistance, and high optical transparency. In this review, we have reviewed the recent progress of electrodes based on graphene, graphene/polymer compounds and graphene-related materials for neuron signal recording, stimulation, and related optical signal coupling technology, which provides an outlook on the role of electrodes in the nanotechnology-neuron interface as well as medical diagnosis.

Journal of Materials Chemistry, Issue 46, Oct. 2021

Neural Lace and Programmable Cells

3 April 2017. Thrivous – The Human Enhancement Company

Elon Musk, the maverick tech entrepreneur who, after creating luxury electric cars with Tesla Motors and reusable rockets with SpaceX, plans to colonize Mars and then bootstrap an interplanetary civilization, is working to develop operational, high-speed Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCI) based on a family of futuristic technologies that he calls “neural lace.” Future neural lace tech could permit sending information back and forth between the brain and a computer – or the cloud – at ultra-high bandwidth.

“Your phone and your computer are extensions of you, but the interface is through finger movements or speech, which are very slow,” said Musk, as reported by Vanity Fair. “For a meaningful partial-brain interface, I think we’re roughly four or five years away.”

That might be a little over-optimistic. But last week scientists funded by the European Commission reported BCI advances based on graphene transistor arrays for high resolution brain imaging, which can be seen as precursors and enablers of full-blown neural lace tech. Other scientists are beginning to cross the bridge between life and computers in the other direction as well, with genetically engineered programmable cells that could one day act as tiny computers and robots within the body.

….

We might have to wait a little while for promising research advances in neural lace and programmable cells to become medical reality for therapy and enhancement. But other forms of enhancement could become practical reality sooner and, for example, allow older women to become pregnant by having their ovaries rejuvenated.

The future is marching toward us, perhaps even running. If you find that stressful, you could talk to your doctor about medical marijuana, whose anti-stress properties have been confirmed by a recent study.

New experimental treatment seems to rejuvenate ovaries and allow older women to get pregnant. Researchers at the Genesis Athens Clinic in Greece have found ways to allow menopausal women, thought to be infertile, to become pregnant using their own eggs, New Scientist reports. The scientists have used a technique that seems to rejuvenate ovaries, but how that happens isn’t clear at the moment. The researchers are now planning clinical trials in Greece and the US. If these research findings are confirmed and shown to work in practice, a treatment could be developed to enable older women to get pregnant.

…

Elon Musk’s new company Neuralink wants to develop visionary brain implants. Elon Musk, the superstar futurist and entrepreneur who founded and runs Tesla Motors and SpaceX, wants to merge human brains and computers next, WSJ reports. Tesla Motors Club has a non-paywalled copy of the WSJ article. Musk co-founded Neuralink Corp. to pursue “neural lace” technology – brain implants that may one day upload and download thoughts. A first iteration of neural lace technology could consist of thin and flexible tissue-like electronic chips rolled up in a needle, injected in the brain, and then unrolling and blending with the brain’s neural circuitry. The WSJ spoke with Neuralink co-founder Max Hodak and Boston University Prof. Timothy Gardner, who joined the company. Bryan Johnson, the wealthy founder of online payments company Braintree, launched a well-funded startup called Kernel to pursue similar developments.

Flexible graphene probes record brain activity in high resolution. Researchers associated with the Graphene Flagship project of the European Commission have developed flexible devices, based on graphene field-effect transistors, for recording brain activity in high resolution. The research work, published in 2D Materials, shows that arrays of 16 graphene-based transistors, each with an active area less than the cross section of a human hair, arranged on a flexible substrate and placed on the surface of the brain, permit recording of neural activity by detecting electric fields generated when neurons fire. The researchers suggest that this technology could lay the foundation for a future generation of in-vivo implants for therapeutic brain stimulation technologies and interfaces for sensory and motor devices. Of course, hidden between the lines of the aseptic bureaucratese favored by the European Commission, there’s the prospect of visionary technologies like Musk’s neural lace.

Synthetic biologists advance toward programmable mammalian cells. Scientists led by Wilson Wong, a synthetic biologist at Boston University, have found ways to genetically engineer the DNA of mammalian cells to carry out complex computations, in effect turning the cells into biocomputers. By cutting, pasting and reassembling DNA strands, the researchers built 113 different circuits, each designed to carry out a different logical operation, with a 96.5 percent success rate, The study, published in Nature Biotechnology, has been covered by Wired. The researchers hope programmable cells will have a big impact on medicine, for example by improving the immune system with artificial genetic circuits that detect and wipe out tumors, or synthetically generating biological tissues on demand.

Paper: Mapping brain activity with flexible graphene micro-transistors

Benno M Blaschke1, Núria Tort-Colet2, Anton Guimerà-Brunet3,4, Julia Weinert2, Lionel Rousseau5, Axel Heimann6, Simon Drieschner1, Oliver Kempski6, Rosa Villa3,4, Maria V Sanchez-Vives2,7

Published 24 February 2017 • © 2017 IOP Publishing Ltd

Abstract

Establishing a reliable communication interface between the brain and electronic devices is of paramount importance for exploiting the full potential of neural prostheses. Current microelectrode technologies for recording electrical activity, however, evidence important shortcomings, e.g. challenging high density integration. Solution-gated field-effect transistors (SGFETs), on the other hand, could overcome these shortcomings if a suitable transistor material were available. Graphene is particularly attractive due to its biocompatibility, chemical stability, flexibility, low intrinsic electronic noise and high charge carrier mobilities. Here, we report on the use of an array of flexible graphene SGFETs for recording spontaneous slow waves, as well as visually evoked and also pre-epileptic activity in vivo in rats. The flexible array of graphene SGFETs allows mapping brain electrical activity with excellent signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), suggesting that this technology could lay the foundation for a future generation of in vivo recording implants.

2D Materials
fnsys-12-00012Download

Direct Neural Interface & DARPA – Dr Justin Sanchez (ted talks, 2017):

Come down to graphene avenue

FOX BUSINESS
CUREVAC
CEPI

So, according to Wikipedia:

In October 2013 CureVac launched a collaboration with Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc., a Johnson & Johnson company, for the development of novel flu vaccines.[15] Also in 2013, CureVac announced the fourth in a series of partnerships with the Cancer Research Institute and Ludwig Cancer Research to enable clinical testing of novel cancer immunotherapy treatment options.[16]

In March 2014, CureVac won a €2 million prize awarded by the European Commission to stimulate new vaccine technologies.[17] Later, in July 2014, CureVac signed an exclusive license agreement with Sanofi Pasteur to develop and commercialize an mRNA-based prophylactic vaccine.[18] By September 2014, the company licensed the global rights for its Phase I candidate – CV9202 – to Boehringer Ingelheim. Boehringer was to conduct trials using the mRNA vaccine in combination with afatinib in advanced and/or metastatic epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as well as inoperable stage III NSCLC.[19]

In March 2015, a CureVac investor, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, agreed to provide separate funding for several projects to develop prophylactic vaccines based on CureVac’s proprietary mRNA platform.[20] By September 2015, CureVac entered into a collaboration with the International AIDS Vaccine Initiative (IAVI) to accelerate the development of AIDS vaccines, utilizing immunogens developed by IAVI and partners, delivered via CureVac’s mRNA technology.[21] That same month, CureVac announced it would open a United States hub in Boston, Massachusetts.[22]

In accordance with its deal with Lilly, the company began construction on a production facility in 2016.[23]

In February 2019, the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) awarded CureVac a $34 million grant from to develop its proprietary “RNA printer” prototype.[24] The technology is expected to allow the company to rapidly produce mRNA vaccine candidates at scale, from multiple locations globally, to bypass the logistical hurdles that often delay the production of vaccines in response to infectious disease emergencies, and also enable the production of personalized medicines.[24] The initial uses would be for their candidate vaccines for Lassa fever, yellow fever, and rabies.[24]

In July 2020, Tesla, Inc CEO Elon Musk announced via Tweet that Tesla and CureVac had reached an agreement to produce portable “RNA microfactories” based on this technology to manufacture CureVac’s COVID-19 vaccine candidate.[24] CureVac had stated that the bioprinters would be able to produce “more than a hundred thousand doses” within approximately two weeks.[24] At approximately the same time, Tesla and CureVac filed a joint patent on the technology.[25] In August, Musk reviewed the project with Curevac while in Germany.[25]

Learn more: https://silview.media/?s=graphene

To be continued?
Our work and existence, as media and people, is funded solely by our most generous supporters. But we’re not really covering our costs so far, and we’re in dire needs to upgrade our equipment, especially for video production.
Help SILVIEW.media survive and grow, please donate here, anything helps. Thank you!

! Articles can always be subject of later editing as a way of perfecting them

DETAILS / ORDER

by on

by Silviu “Silview” Costinescu

Since 2021, I’ve kept hearing people saying many of their vaxxed friends and relatives are not the same since the Covid shots, in terms of personality.
Then I heard vaxxed people saying they don’t feel (themselves) the same since the shots.
Then I heard comedians saying performing for vaxxed crowds is not the same.
And, after a while, I just had to start looking for clues.

Soothing the symptoms of anxiety with graphene oxide

Graphene Flagship / Publishing date: 23 June 2021

Graphene oxide inhibits post-traumatic stress disorder.

Researchers from Graphene Flagship partners SISSA in Italy, ICN2 in Spain and the University of Manchester in the UK, in collaboration with the Ribeirão Preto Medical School of the University of São Paulo, have discovered that graphene oxide inhibits anxiety-related behaviours in a model study. They found that injecting graphene oxide into a specific region of the brain silences the neurons responsible for anxious behaviour.

The scientists used a common animal model: just like in the classic cartoon Tom and Jerry, a mouse lives in a hole in the wall of a small room, where it feels protected and safe. Normally, the mouse explores the room freely and without worry. But when the mouse smells a cat, it runs back into its hole, where it knows it is safe. This is a very strong defensive behaviour and the basis for the fight or flight response, which is intrinsic to most animals.

After one week in this environment, the mouse remembers this behaviour, even after the cat’s scent has gone. This is a model for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), a protective anxiety behaviour that arises in response to negative memories. Millions of people around the world suffer from disorders related to PTSD or anxiety.

Laura Ballerini, lead author of the paper and Professor of Physiology at Graphene Flagship partner SISSA, Italy, explains that graphene oxide disables communication between the synapses that cause this type of fear.

“Two days after injecting graphene oxide into a specific region of the mouse’s brain, it behaved like other mice that had never experienced the smell of a cat in their home environment. In other words, graphene oxide inhibited the mouse’s anxiety-related behaviour,” Ballerini explains. She says that two days is roughly the time for memories to form and be consolidated in the mouse’s brain, which corresponds to the time for the symptoms of anxiety to subside.

“Graphene oxide interacts with the part of the brain responsible for the formation of fear-related memories, which cause anxiety. It doesn’t work like a drug, by inhibiting the function of the receptors – instead, it temporarily halts the entire mechanism long enough to disrupt the brain’s fear-related pathology, without damaging them,” continues Ballerini.

Graphene oxide interrupts anxiety-related neuron signals without affecting the neurons, or the surrounding cells. In simple terms, it only ‘turns down’ the communications between specific neurons. In a disease where these communications are over-expressed, like PTSD and anxiety, targeting the synapses with graphene oxide is enough to halt the development of this pathological behaviour. This is a type of precision medicine.

Graphene oxide is naturally eliminated after a few days, as the surrounding tissue digests the material. Ballerini says that, after two days, they did not observe any inflammation, and no traces of graphene oxide remained at all. Next, Ballerini and colleagues will seek to combine the synapse-targeting behaviour of graphene oxide with its ability to attach to carrier molecules for drug delivery.

Serge Picaud, Deputy Leader of the Graphene Flagship’s Biomedical Technologies Work Package, comments: “This work provides another great demonstration of the therapeutic potential of graphene, used either alone or included in a medical device.”

Andrea C. Ferrari, Science and Technology Officer of the Graphene Flagship and Chair of its Management Panel, adds: “The healthcare, environmental and biological applications of graphene and related materials have been investigated by the Graphene Flagship since its inception. This work opens up a new avenue of research and showcases a path for a very important therapeutic use of graphene oxide – one of the most common forms of functionalised graphene.”

The Graphene Flagship is a Future and Emerging Technology Flagship by the European Commission.

With a budget of €1 billion, the Graphene Flagship represents a new form of joint, coordinated research on an unprecedented scale, forming Europe’s biggest ever research initiative.

The Graphene Flagship is tasked with bringing together academic and industrial researchers to take graphene from the realm of academic laboratories into European society in the space of 10 years, thus generating economic growth, new jobs and new opportunities.

The core consortium consists of approximately 170 academic and industrial research groups in 22 countries. In addition, the project has a growing number of associated members that are incorporated in the scientific and technological work packages.

The Graphene Flagship is coordinated by Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Graphene oxide prevents lateral amygdala dysfunctional synaptic plasticity and reverts long lasting anxiety behavior in rats

1-s2.0-s0142961221001058-mainDownload

Graphene oxide-induced neurotoxicity on neurotransmitters, AFD neurons and locomotive behavior in Caenorhabditis elegans

NeuroToxicology, Volume 77, March 2020, Pages 30-39

Abstract

Graphene oxide (GO) and graphene-based nanomaterials have been widely applied in recent years, but their potential health risk and neurotoxic potentials remain poorly understood. In this study, neurotoxic potential of GO and its underlying molecular and cellular mechanism were investigated using the nematode, Caenorhabditis elegans. Deposition of GO in the head region and increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) was observed in C. elegans after exposure to GO. The neurotoxic potential of GO was then investigated, focusing on neurotransmitters contents and neuronal activity using AFD sensory neurons. The contents of all neurotransmitters, such as, tyrosine, tryptophan, dopamine, tyramine, and GABA, decreased significantly by GO exposure. Decreased fluorescence of Pgcy-8:GFP, a marker of AFD sensory neuron, by GO exposure suggested GO could cause neuronal damage on AFD neuron. GO exposure led decreased expression of ttx-1 and ceh-14, genes required for the function of AFD neurons also confirmed possible detrimental effect of GO to AFD neuron. To understand physiological meaning of AFD neuronal damage by GO exposure, locomotive behavior was then investigated in wild-type as well as in loss-of-function mutants of ttx-1 and ceh-14. GO exposure significantly altered locomotor behavior markers, such as, speed, acceleration, stop time, etc., in wild-type C. elegans, which were mostly rescued in AFD neuron mutants. The present study suggested the GO possesses neurotoxic potential, especially on neurotransmitters and AFD neuron in C. elegans. These findings provide useful information to understand the neurotoxic potential of GO and other graphene-based nanomaterials, which will guide their safe application.

1-s2.0-s1369702112701013-mainDownload

Also must see:

TOXIC GRAPHENE OXIDE A BIG INDUSTRY SECRET, STU PETERS JUST SCRATCHING THE SURFACE. IS THIS WHY GATES REFUSED TO SHARE PATENTS?

US’ “NANOTECH INITIATIVE” confirms our worst findings about vaccines and more

To be continued?
Our work and existence, as media and people, is funded solely by our most generous supporters. But we’re not really covering our costs so far, and we’re in dire needs to upgrade our equipment, especially for video production.
Help SILVIEW.media survive and grow, please donate here, anything helps. Thank you!

! Articles can always be subject of later editing as a way of perfecting them

Sometimes my memes are 3D. And you can own them. Or send them to someone.
You can even eat some of them.
CLICK HERE

by on

by Silviu “Silview” Costinescu

nni-2021-strategic-planDownload

Biden-⁠Harris Administration Releases Strategic Plan To Ensure U.S. Nanotechnology Competitiveness

White House / October 09, 2021

New plan aims to accelerate research translation, advance equity

Today, on National Nanotechnology Day, the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) and the National Nanotechnology Coordination Office (NNCO) unveiled the 2021 National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI) Strategic Plan. This strategy details a new framework to ensure that the United States continues to lead the world not only in nanoscience discoveries, but in translating and manufacturing its products to benefit all of America. In addition to identifying priorities for the NNI to best support the research community in the United States, the plan prioritizes efforts to expand sustainable infrastructure and advance equity in the nanotechnology workforce.

“The role of nanotechnology in our response to the pandemic—from vaccine delivery to protective clothing to testing kits—emphasizes the potential for small science to have big impacts,” said National Nanotechnology Coordination Office Director Dr. Lisa E. Friedersdorf. “This strategic plan charts an exciting path forward for the National Nanotechnology Initiative to ensure continued progress in nanotechnology research and development, and to attract students from across all of America.”

Nanotechnology research and development requires access to specialized tools and facilities. This plan emphasizes the need to expand and refresh the research infrastructure, and provide access that supports researchers and small business across all of America. This research infrastructure also plays a critical role in training the future workforce for high-paying jobs.

Since the launch of the NNI in 2000, nanoscience has transformed from an emerging area of research to a technology that is fueling real-world applications in areas as diverse as consumer electronics, water purification, infrastructure, medicine, energy, space exploration, and agriculture. Nanotechnology underpins and enables other critical technologies, including quantum computing and artificial intelligence, and will also help address the most significant challenges facing the world, including pandemic preparedness, climate change, and food insecurity. This strategic plan lays out a path to ensure continued U.S. leadership in this important area.

More on the National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI): The NNI was announced in 2000 and codified on Dec. 3, 2003, through the 21st Century Nanotechnology Research and Development Act (15 USC §7501), to enhance interagency coordination of nanotechnology research and development; support a shared infrastructure; enable leveraging of resources while avoiding duplication; and establish shared goals, priorities, and strategies that complement agency-specific missions and activities.

More information on the NNI, including upcoming events and opportunities to engage, is available on Nano.gov. Inquiries and comments also can be sent to info@nnco.nano.gov.

###

This above is probably why some people attribute this to Biden’s admin. They\ve never come out with anything new and original, not even that oxymoronic “Build Back Better” slogan. This dates back to the Clinton admin, and originates in military research:

nni-clintonDownload

This video will explain Joe Biden’s “Moonshot Speech”

According to Wikipedia:

“Mihail C. Roco proposed the initiative in a 1999 presentation to the White House under the Clinton administration. The NNI was officially launched in 2000 and received funding for the first time in FY2001.

President Bill Clinton advocated nanotechnology development. In a 21 January 2000 speech at the California Institute of Technology, Clinton stated that “Some of our research goals may take twenty or more years to achieve, but that is precisely why there is an important role for the federal government.”

President George W. Bush further increased funding for nanotechnology. On 3 December 2003 Bush signed into law the 21st Century Nanotechnology Research and Development Act (Pub. L. 108–153 (text) (PDF)), which authorizes expenditures for five of the participating agencies totaling $3.63 billion over four years. This law is an authorization, not an appropriation, and subsequent appropriations for these five agencies have not met the goals set out in the 2003 Act. However, there are many agencies involved in the Initiative that are not covered by the Act, and requested budgets under the Initiative for all participating agencies in Fiscal Years 2006 – 2015 totaled over $1 billion each.

In February 2014, the National Nanotechnology Initiative released a Strategic Plan outlining updated goals and “program component areas”, as required under the terms of the Act. This document supersedes the NNI Strategic Plans released in 2004 and 2007.

The NNI’s budget supplement proposed by the Obama administration for Fiscal Year 2015 provides $1.5 billion in requested funding. The cumulative NNI investment since fiscal year 2001, including the 2015 request, totals almost $21 billion. Cumulative investments in nanotechnology-related environmental, health, and safety research since 2005 now total nearly $900 million. The Federal agencies with the largest investments are the National Institutes of Health, National Science Foundation, Department of Energy, Department of Defense, and the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

The NNI cumulative investment by 2021 inclusive reached $36 billion, and nanotechnology has become pervasive in material, energy and biosystem related applications.”

Where we learn that the invention of the Lipid Nano-Containers used in Covid mRNA vaccines was publicly-funded research, Pfizer and Moderna just parasiting government’s achievements and selling it back to the people, “the owners of the Government”, at astronomical prices.

And LNC’s are made with PEGs that are made with graphene-oxide, which is also mentioned in the retrospective video above.

However. it’s 2023 now and here we are:

nanotech-ini-nni-fy23-budget-supplementDownload

BONUS

Here’s something to further support for our findings that legal drug dealers and arms dealers are not really separate cartels, but rather form a Military BioTech Complex, that also includes the Silicone Valley freaks:

military-nanotechnologyDownload

And on the heels of this, later came :
Obama, DARPA, GSK and Rockefeller’s $4.5B B.R.A.I.N. Initiative – better sit when you read

Nanotechnology Timeline

According to NNI

This timeline features Premodern example of nanotechnology, as well as Modern Era discoveries and milestones in the field of nanotechnology.

Premodern Examples of Nanotechnologies

Early examples of nanostructured materials were based on craftsmen’s empirical understanding and manipulation of materials. Use of high heat was one common step in their processes to produce these materials with novel properties.

Photo of the Lycurgus Cup at the British Museum, lit from withoutPhoto of the Lycurgus Cup at the British Museum, lit from within  
The Lycurgus Cup at the British Museum, lit from the outside (left) and from the inside (right)

4th Century: The Lycurgus Cup (Rome) is an example of dichroic glass; colloidal gold and silver in the glass allow it to look opaque green when lit from outside but translucent red when light shines through the inside. (Images at left.)

Photo, 9th C Iraq lustreware bowl
Polychrome lustreware bowl, 9th C, Iraq, British Museum (©Trinitat Pradell 2008)

9th-17th Centuries: Glowing, glittering “luster” ceramic glazes used in the Islamic world, and later in Europe, contained silver or copper or other metallic nanoparticles. (Image at right.)

Photo, Rose window, Notre Dame Cathedral
The South rose window of Notre Dame Cathedral, ca 1250

6th-15th Centuries: Vibrant stained glass windows in European cathedrals owed their rich colors to nanoparticles of gold chloride and other metal oxides and chlorides; gold nanoparticles also acted as photocatalytic air purifiers. (Image at left.)

13th-18th Centuries: “Damascus” saber blades contained carbon nanotubes and cementite nanowires—an ultrahigh-carbon steel formulation that gave them strength, resilience, the ability to hold a keen edge, and a visible moiré pattern in the steel that give the blades their name. (Images below.)

Photo, Damascus saber, 17th CPhoto, carbon nanotubes in a Damascus sword, 17th C
(Left) A Damascus saber (photo by Tina Fineberg for The New York Times). (Right) High-resolution transmission electron microscopy image of carbon nanotubes in a genuine Damascus sabre after dissolution in hydrochloric acid, showing remnants of cementite nanowires encapsulated by carbon nanotubes (scale bar, 5 nm) (M. Reibold, P. Paufler, A. A. Levin, W. Kochmann, N. Pätzke & D. C. Meyer, Nature 444, 286, 2006).

Examples of Discoveries and Developments Enabling Nanotechnology in the Modern Era

These are based on increasingly sophisticated scientific understanding and instrumentation, as well as experimentation.

Photo, bottle of colloidal "ruby" gold solution
“Ruby” gold colloid (Gold Bulletin 2007 40,4, p. 267)

1857: Michael Faraday discovered colloidal “ruby” gold, demonstrating that nanostructured gold under certain lighting conditions produces different-colored solutions.


1936: Erwin Müller, working at Siemens Research Laboratory, invented the field emission microscope, allowing near-atomic-resolution images of materials.

1947: John Bardeen, William Shockley, and Walter Brattain at Bell Labs discovered the semiconductor transistor and greatly expanded scientific knowledge of semiconductor interfaces, laying the foundation for electronic devices and the Information Age.

Photo, 1947 transistor, Bell Labs
1947 transistor, Bell Labs

 
1950: Victor La Mer and Robert Dinegar developed the theory and a process for growing monodisperse colloidal materials. Controlled ability to fabricate colloids enables myriad industrial uses such as specialized papers, paints, and thin films, even dialysis treatments.


1951: Erwin Müller pioneered the field ion microscope, a means to image the arrangement of atoms at the surface of a sharp metal tip; he first imaged tungsten atoms.



1956: Arthur von Hippel at MIT introduced many concepts of—and coined the term—“molecular engineering” as applied to dielectrics, ferroelectrics, and piezoelectrics
 

Photo, Jack Kilby, 1960
Jack Kilby, about 1960.

1958: Jack Kilby of Texas Instruments originated the concept of, designed, and built the first integrated circuit, for which he received the Nobel Prize in 2000. (Image at left.)

Photo of Richard Feynman
Richard Feynman (Caltech archives)

1959:  Richard Feynman of the California Institute of Technology gave what is considered to be the first lecture on technology and engineering at the atomic scale, “There’s Plenty of Room at the Bottom” at an American Physical Society meeting at Caltech. (Image at right.)
 

Moore's Law graph
Moore’s first public graph showing his vision of the semiconductor industry being able to “cram more components onto  integrated circuits“

 
1965: Intel co-founder Gordon Moore described in Electronics magazine several trends he foresaw in the field of electronics. One trend now known as “Moore’s Law,” described the density of transistors on an integrated chip (IC) doubling every 12 months (later amended to every 2 years). Moore also saw chip sizes and costs shrinking with their growing functionality—with a transformational effect on the ways people live and work. That the basic trend Moore envisioned has continued for 50 years is to a large extent due to the semiconductor industry’s increasing reliance on nanotechnology as ICs and transistors have approached atomic dimensions.1974:  Tokyo Science University Professor Norio Taniguchi coined the term nanotechnology to describe precision machining of materials to within atomic-scale dimensional tolerances. (See graph at left.)



1981:  Gerd Binnig and Heinrich Rohrer at IBM’s Zurich lab invented the scanning tunneling microscope, allowing scientists to “see” (create direct spatial images of) individual atoms for the first time. Binnig and Rohrer won the Nobel Prize for this discovery in 1986.



1981: Russia’s Alexei Ekimov discovered nanocrystalline, semiconducting quantum dots in a glass matrix and conducted pioneering studies of their electronic and optical properties.

1985:  Rice University researchers Harold Kroto, Sean O’Brien, Robert Curl, and Richard Smalley discovered the Buckminsterfullerene (C60), more commonly known as the buckyball, which is a molecule resembling a soccer ball in shape and composed entirely of carbon, as are graphite and diamond. The team was awarded the 1996 Nobel Prize in Chemistry for their roles in this discovery and that of the fullerene class of molecules more generally. (Artist’s rendering at right.)depiction of buckyball

1985: Bell Labs’s Louis Brus discovered colloidal semiconductor nanocrystals (quantum dots), for which he shared the 2008 Kavli Prize in Nanotechnology.

1986:  Gerd Binnig, Calvin Quate, and Christoph Gerber invented the atomic force microscope, which has the capability to view, measure, and manipulate materials down to fractions of a nanometer in size, including measurement of various forces intrinsic to nanomaterials.

Image of IBM spelled in xenon atoms

1989: Don Eigler and Erhard Schweizer at IBM’s Almaden Research Center manipulated 35 individual xenon atoms to spell out the IBM logo. This demonstration of the ability to precisely manipulate atoms ushered in the applied use of nanotechnology. (Image at left.)


1990s: Early nanotechnology companies began to operate, e.g., Nanophase Technologies in 1989, Helix Energy Solutions Group in 1990, Zyvex in 1997, Nano-Tex in 1998….

1991: Sumio Iijima of NEC is credited with discovering the carbon nanotube (CNT), although there were early observations of tubular carbon structures by others as well. Iijima shared the Kavli Prize in Nanoscience in 2008 for this advance and other advances in the field. CNTs, like buckyballs, are entirely composed of carbon, but in a tubular shape. They exhibit extraordinary properties in terms of strength, electrical and thermal conductivity, among others. (Image below.)

Carbon nanotubesSEM image of CNT paperimage of an array of CNTs
Carbon nanotubes (courtesy, National Science Foundation). The properties of CNTs are being explored for applications in electronics, photonics, multifunctional fabrics, biology (e.g., as a scaffold to grow bone cells), and communications. See a 2009 Discovery Magazine article for other examplesSEM micrograph of purified nanotube “paper” in which the nanotubes are the fibers (scale bar, 0.001 mm) (courtesy, NASA).An array of aligned carbon nanotubes, which can act like a radio antenna for detecting light at visible wave- lengths (scale bar 0.001 mm) (courtesy, K. Kempa, Boston College).

 
1992: C.T. Kresge and colleagues at Mobil Oil discovered the nanostructured catalytic materials MCM-41 and MCM-48, now used heavily in refining crude oil as well as for drug delivery, water treatment, and other varied applications.

image of MCM-41 pore structureTEM image of MCM-41's straight pores
MCM-41 is a “mesoporous molecular sieve” silica nanomaterial with a hexagonal or “honeycomb” arrangement of its straight cylindrical pores, as shown in this TEM image (courtesy of Thomas Pauly, Michigan State University).This TEM image of MCM-41 looks at the straight cylindrical pores as they lie perpendicular to the viewing axis (courtesy of Thomas Pauly, Michigan State University).

 
1993: Moungi Bawendi of MIT invented a method for controlled synthesis of nanocrystals (quantum dots), paving the way for applications ranging from computing to biology to high-efficiency photovoltaics and lighting. Within the next several years, work by other researchers such as Louis Brus and Chris Murray also contributed methods for synthesizing quantum dots.

1998:  The Interagency Working Group on Nanotechnology (IWGN) was formed under the National Science and Technology Council to investigate the state of the art in nanoscale science and technology and to forecast possible future developments. The IWGN’s study and report, Nanotechnology Research Directions: Vision for the Next Decade (1999) defined the vision for and led directly to formation of the U.S. National Nanotechnology Initiative in 2000.
 

Image of molecular assembly fof an FeCO2 molecule, in four stages
The progression of steps of using a scanning tunneling microscope tip to “assemble” an iron carbonyl molecule, beginning with Fe (iron) and CO (carbon monoxide) molecules (A), joining them to produce FeCO (B), then adding a second CO molecule (C), to achieve the FECO2 molecule (D). (H.J. Lee, W. Ho, Science 286, 1719 [1999].)

1999: Cornell University researchers Wilson Ho and Hyojune Lee probed secrets of chemical bonding by assembling a molecule [iron carbonyl Fe(CO)2] from constituent components [iron (Fe) and carbon monoxide (CO)] with a scanning tunneling microscope. (Image at left.)
 

1999: Chad Mirkin at Northwestern University invented dip-pen nanolithography® (DPN®), leading to manufacturable, reproducible “writing” of electronic circuits as well as patterning of biomaterials for cell biology research, nanoencryption, and other applications. (Image below right.)

Image of DPN depositing biomolecular materials in patterns
Use of DPN to deposit biomaterials ©2010 Nanoink

1999–early 2000’s:  Consumer products making use of nanotechnology began appearing in the marketplace, including lightweight nanotechnology-enabled automobile bumpers that resist denting and scratching, golf balls that fly straighter, tennis rackets that are stiffer (therefore, the ball rebounds faster), baseball bats with better flex and “kick,” nano-silver antibacterial socks, clear sunscreens, wrinkle- and stain-resistant clothing, deep-penetrating therapeutic cosmetics, scratch-resistant glass coatings, faster-recharging batteries for cordless electric tools, and improved displays for televisions, cell phones, and digital cameras.

various images of nanotechnology-enabled products

2000: President Clinton launched the National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI) to coordinate Federal R&D efforts and promote U.S. competitiveness in nanotechnology. Congress funded the NNI for the first time in FY2001. The NSET Subcommittee of the NSTC was designated as the interagency group responsible for coordinating the NNI.

2003:  Congress enacted the 21st Century Nanotechnology Research and Development Act (P.L. 108-153). The act provided a statutory foundation for the NNI, established programs, assigned agency responsibilities, authorized funding levels, and promoted research to address key issues.

Computer simulation of growth of gold nanoshell with silica core and over-layer of gold
Computer simulation of growth of gold nanoshell with silica core and over-layer of gold (courtesy N. Halas, Genome News Network, 2003) 

 
2003: Naomi Halas, Jennifer West, Rebekah Drezek, and Renata Pasqualin at Rice University developed gold nanoshells, which when “tuned” in size to absorb near-infrared light, serve as a platform for the integrated discovery, diagnosis, and treatment of breast cancer without invasive biopsies, surgery, or systemically destructive radiation or chemotherapy.2004: The European Commission adopted the Communication “Towards a European Strategy for Nanotechnology,” COM(2004) 338, which proposed institutionalizing European nanoscience and nanotechnology R&D efforts within an integrated and responsible strategy, and which spurred European action plans and ongoing funding for nanotechnology R&D. (Image at left.)

2004: Britain’s Royal Society and the Royal Academy of Engineering published Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties advocating the need to address potential health, environmental, social, ethical, and regulatory issues associated with nanotechnology.

2004:  SUNY Albany launched the first college-level education program in nanotechnology in the United States, the College of Nanoscale Science and Engineering.

2005: Erik Winfree and Paul Rothemund from the California Institute of Technology developed theories for DNA-based computation and “algorithmic self-assembly” in which computations are embedded in the process of nanocrystal growth.
 

Nanoscale car from Rice University
Nanocar with turning buckyball wheels (credit: RSC, 29 March 2006).

 
2006:  James Tour and colleagues at Rice University built a nanoscale car made of oligo(phenylene ethynylene) with alkynyl axles and four spherical C60 fullerene (buckyball) wheels. In response to increases in temperature, the nanocar moved about on a gold surface as a result of the buckyball wheels turning, as in a conventional car. At temperatures above 300°C it moved around too fast for the chemists to keep track of it! (Image at left.)

2007: Angela Belcher and colleagues at MIT built a lithium-ion battery with a common type of virus that is nonharmful to humans, using a low-cost and environmentally benign process. The batteries have the same energy capacity and power performance as state-of-the-art rechargeable batteries being considered to power plug-in hybrid cars, and they could also be used to power personal electronic devices. (Image at right.)

MIT researchers Chiang, Belcher, and Hammond
(L to R) MIT professors Yet-Ming Chiang, Angela Belcher, and Paula Hammond display a virus-loaded film that can serve as the anode of a battery. (Photo: Donna Coveney, MIT News.)

 
2008:  The first official NNI Strategy for Nanotechnology-Related Environmental, Health, and Safety (EHS) Research was published, based on a two-year process of NNI-sponsored investigations and public dialogs. This strategy document was updated in 2011, following a series of workshops and public review.

2009–2010: Nadrian Seeman and colleagues at New York University created several DNA-like robotic nanoscale assembly devices. One is a process for creating 3D DNA structures using synthetic sequences of DNA crystals that can be programmed to self-assemble using “sticky ends” and placement in a set order and orientation. Nanoelectronics could benefit: the flexibility and density that 3D nanoscale components allow could enable assembly of parts that are smaller, more complex, and more closely spaced. Another Seeman creation (with colleagues at China’s Nanjing University) is a “DNA assembly line.” For this work, Seeman shared the Kavli Prize in Nanoscience in 2010.

2010: IBM used a silicon tip measuring only a few nanometers at its apex (similar to the tips used in atomic force microscopes) to chisel away material from a substrate to create a complete nanoscale 3D relief map of the world one-one-thousandth the size of a grain of salt—in 2 minutes and 23 seconds. This activity demonstrated a powerful patterning methodology for generating nanoscale patterns and structures as small as 15 nanometers at greatly reduced cost and complexity, opening up new prospects for fields such as electronics, optoelectronics, and medicine. (Image below.)

Rendered image of a nanoscale silicon tip chiseling a relief map of the world
A rendered image of a nanoscale silicon tip chiseling out the smallest relief map of the world from a substrate of organic molecular glass. Shown middle foreground is the Mediterranean Sea and Europe. (Image courtesy of Advanced Materials.)

 
2011: The NSET Subcommittee updated both the NNI Strategic Plan and the NNI Environmental, Health, and Safety Research Strategy, drawing on extensive input from public workshops and online dialog with stakeholders from Government, academia, NGOs, and the public, and others.

2012: The NNI launched two more Nanotechnology Signature Initiatives (NSIs)–Nanosensors and the Nanotechnology Knowledge Infrastructure (NKI)–bringing the total to five NSIs.

2013: 
  -The NNI starts the next round of Strategic Planning, starting with the Stakeholder Workshop. 
  -Stanford researchers develop the first carbon nanotube computer.

2014:
  -The NNI releases the updated 2014 Strategic Plan.
  –The NNI releases the 2014 Progress Review on the Coordinated Implementation of the NNI 2011 Environmental, Health, and Safety Research Strategy.

To be continued?
Our work and existence, as media and people, is funded solely by our most generous supporters. But we’re not really covering our costs so far, and we’re in dire needs to upgrade our equipment, especially for video production.
Help SILVIEW.media survive and grow, please donate here, anything helps. Thank you!

! Articles can always be subject of later editing as a way of perfecting them

Sometimes my memes are 3D. And you can own them. Or send them to someone.
You can even eat some of them.
CLICK HERE

by on

by Silviu “Silview” Costinescu

BIGGEST BOMBSHELL WE’VE BEEN DISTRACTED FROM LATELY.

How it started:

Over to years ago I warned everyone this is way more than just a sound bit, and the consequences are huge:

Early 2021. CLICK TO FIND OUT MORE
RETIRED SLOVENIAN NURSE SAYS 30% OF POPULATION GETTING VACCINE PLACEBO (AUGUST 2021)

Where it’s at

A plethora of sources have confirmed, since my 2021 warning, that the establishment did the human testing on the general public, without consent, deliberately misleading the general population, in absolute defiance of the main Nuremberg Code tenant: no medical procedures and experimentation without informed consent.

Pfizer executive admits vaccine was never tested for preventing transmission

Here’s just the most recent, nailing the Nazi Swastika on the walls of every government and every Pharmafia institution that participated in this, as much as on the walls of every vaxxer that helped the genocide efforts in any way.

30% of Pfizer Covid jabs were PLACEBOS – Danish study. Biggest bombshell we’ve been distracted from

Kim Iversen did an awesome job with her report, that’s why I gave up finishing mine.
Except for missing a few major aspects:

  • I have seen no evidence that the placebo batch came in later, as a way to compensate for the high rate of earlier adverse effects.
  • Were the prices adjusted to the vial content? (No)

And, most importantly:

  • MEDICAL INTERVENTIONS OR EXPERIMENTATION WITHOUT IFORMED CONSENT ARE WAR CRIMES.
The Nuremberg Code

So this cements the guilt of everyone that has ever contributed to another person’s decision to take these jabs.

THE WHOLE WORLD HAS BEEN TRANSFORMED IN AN AUSCHWITZ RAN BY DOCTOR MENGELE DISCIPLES.

Btw, Auschwitz labs were ran by IG Farben, later known as Bayer, later Bayer -Monsanto, later Bayer again.

Bayer who? Bayer this:

SOURCE
At least, they trialed this…
SOURCE

Our governing people are proven to be inhuman, immoral, and most probably illegal occupants of their public / professional positions.

Their sole true position right now is unconvicted convicts.
They occupy other chairs only by force and deception. We can fight both, but let’s start with the deception, which can be ended by means of spreading awareness of the real situation. And non-collaboration.

These facts have no “Undo” button, only severe consequences for everyone, even the uninvolved.

P.S.: They need those health passports to keep track of the batches, among others, the experiment can’t work otherwise. So you can’t be sure they won’t ever get rid of them, we have to get rid of these people first.

update july 15, 2023: this is finally starting to get some steam, but it needs more!

They are also starting to reflect something I forgot to highlight:

It seems like the most damaging batches targeted mostly the seniors. Same as the mass-murdering ventilator protocols.
Which binds into my point that the whole Great Reset has been long planned, but it was triggered by the pensions Ponzi-scheme collapse.
It wasn’t Covid that preferred pension-age people, it was the elites.

RUSSIAN INTELLIGENCE DEFECTOR: LIBERAL DEPOPULATION POLICIES COLLAPSED THE PENSIONS SYSTEM. FINANCIAL COLLAPSE: ORIGINS

Read: ‘OBSCENE’ PANDEMIC BONDS ISSUED IN 2017 BY WORLD BANK FOR CORONAVIRUSES, MARBURG, EBOLA. DESIGNED TO FAIL

To be continued?
Our work and existence, as media and people, is funded solely by our most generous supporters. But we’re not really covering our costs so far, and we’re in dire needs to upgrade our equipment, especially for video production.
Help SILVIEW.media survive and grow, please donate here, anything helps. Thank you!

! Articles can always be subject of later editing as a way of perfecting them

ORDER

by on

by Silviu “Silview” Costinescu

Are 15min cities intelligent “kill boxes”?

All this is the materialization of what we’ve warned you about two years ago – The Military BioTech Complex.

More from KATHERINE WATT:

American Domestic Bioterrorism Program

Congress and US Presidents legalized and funded the overthrow of the U.S. Constitution, the U.S. government and the American people, through a massive domestic bioterrorism program relabeled as a public health program, conducted by the HHS Secretary and Secretary of Defense on behalf of the World Health Organization and its financial backers.

KATHERINE WATT

Building the case to prosecute members of Congress, presidents, HHS and DOD secretaries and federal judges for treason under 18 USC 2381.

2022.09.20-american-domestic-bioterrorism-program-pdfDownload
2022.02.26-legal-walls-of-the-covid19-kill-boxDownload

ALSO THIS:

ENTER THE SENTIENT WORLD SIMULATION (SWS). OH, WAIT, YOU’RE ALREADY IN!

NOT A TYPO, NOT A MISTAKE – THE AUSTRALIAN “AUTHORISATION TO ADMINISTER A POISON”

To be continued?
Our work and existence, as media and people, is funded solely by our most generous supporters. But we’re not really covering our costs so far, and we’re in dire needs to upgrade our equipment, especially for video production.
Help SILVIEW.media survive and grow, please donate here, anything helps. Thank you!

! Articles can always be subject of later editing as a way of perfecting them

Sometimes my memes are 3D. And you can own them. Or send them to someone.
You can even eat some of them.
CLICK HERE

by on

by Silviu “Silview” Costinescu

Pharmafia and Rockefeller Medicine’s best posterboy since Fauci.
At least this one’s funny.

In case you were wondering what “scientism” is: a religious dogma and a polar opposite to science, prime incarnation being, once again, Peter Hotez

Game over, Pharmafia!

To be continued?
Our work and existence, as media and people, is funded solely by our most generous supporters. But we’re not really covering our costs so far, and we’re in dire needs to upgrade our equipment, especially for video production.
Help SILVIEW.media survive and grow, please donate here, anything helps. Thank you!

! Articles can always be subject of later editing as a way of perfecting them

ORDER

by on

by Silviu “Silview” Costinescu

You will never find another report or article about this big event, must have been really fruitful from a scientific standpoint (and their main point, allegedly).

Jeffrey Epstein, Science Philanthropist, Organizes a Global Doomsday Conference.

New York, NY, April 05, 2012 –(PR.com)– In the wake of the March 2011 Tohuku earthquake and tsunami, which created more than 300,000 refugees and radioactive contamination across the entire region, the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists pushed the symbolic Doomsday Clock one minute closer to midnight last January, to reflect the world’s lack of progress with battling climate change and nuclear weapons.

To address this concern, the Jeffrey Epstein Foundation, which funds science research and education, is organizing a second world conference called, Coping with Future Catastrophes to be held most likely in Dubai in the United Arab Emirates.

The first conference took place last December in the US Virgin Islands and brought together a prestigious panel of scientists to identify the greatest threats to the Earth. The threats include acts of bioterrorism, nuclear calamities and/or nuclear warfare, overpopulation, asteroid and meteor threats, super volcanoes, mass tectonic earthquakes, rogue self-replicating nano-machines, super intelligent computers and high-energy chain-reactions that could disrupt the fabric of space itself.

The conference was organized by cognitive scientist, Marvin Minsky, Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at MIT and co-founder of MIT’s AL (Artificial Intelligence) Laboratory. Other scientists included, Martin Nowak, Professor of Biology and Mathematics and Director of the Program for Evolutionary Dynamics at Harvard University, Lawrence Krauss, Professor of Physics, Foundation Professor of the School of Earth and Space Exploration, and Director of the Origins Project at Arizona State University and Gregory Benford, Professor of Physics and Astronomy at the University of California in Irvine.

Lawrence Krauss, who also serves as co-chairman of the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists’ board of sponsors, stated that, “Faced with clear and present dangers of nuclear proliferation and climate change, and the need to find sustainable and safe sources of energy, world leads are failing to change business as usual. …The major challenge at the heart of humanity’s survival in the 21st century is how to meet energy needs for economic growth in developing and industrial countries without further damaging the climate … and without risking further spread of nuclear weapons — and in fact setting the stage for global reductions.”

“We need to identify the greatest threats to our Earth,” Minsky summarized, “but we also need to prioritize them.”

Indeed, the list of prioritized threats that was assembled at the first conference will be debated and refined at the second conference, and will host a larger panel of scientists from around the world. “We’re still in the process of selecting scientists to panel this international conference,” Jeffrey Epstein remarked. “We intend to cast a much wider global net and to have scientists from a wider range of fields including bio and genetic engineering.”

The goal of this second conference however is not just to establish a refined list of the Earth’s greatest threats, but to begin the process of setting up an NGO, a non-governmental agency to monitor the priority list, adjust it accordingly and work on preventative measures.

“So far, there are hundreds of governmental and non-governmental organizations, such as the International Atomic Energy Agency, the Center for Disease Control or the World Health Organization, that monitor potential global catastrophes but they tend to focus on one field of study,” Minsky affirmed. “There’s a great need for an international organization to oversee and collect data from all of these groups, to prioritize looming disasters and to establish preventative measures.”

The second conference, if held in Dubai, will most likely coincide with the 2nd International Conference on Environmental, Biomedical and Biotechnology, set for early August. “Dubai is a neutral meeting ground for the international community and is geared to host large conferences and international media,” Epstein explained.

Established in 1947, the Doomsday Clock now sits at 11:55pm, five minutes before midnight, or Armageddon for the Earth. The closest it ever came to midnight was in 1953, when the clock was pushed to 11:58pm, when United States and the Soviet Union tested thermonuclear devices within nine months of each other. Five minutes to midnight though is hardly a reprieve from that time and we should all be in a state of alert.

Contact Information:

The Jeffrey Epstein Foundation

Christina Galbraith

(917) 573-7604

http://www.jeffreyepsteinfoundation.com

this would make klaus schwab salivate:

SOURCE (DELETED, ARCHIVED)

This is a follow-up to:

JEFFREY EPSTEIN AND THE DECADENCE OF SCIENCE

ALSO SEE:

GHISLAINE MAXWELL DID SPEAK NINE TIMES FOR THE UN. AND I FOUND OUT HOW SHE GOT IN

To be continued?
Our work and existence, as media and people, is funded solely by our most generous supporters. But we’re not really covering our costs so far, and we’re in dire needs to upgrade our equipment, especially for video production.
Help SILVIEW.media survive and grow, please donate here, anything helps. Thank you!

To be continued?
Our work and existence, as media and people, is funded solely by our most generous supporters. But we’re not really covering our costs so far, and we’re in dire needs to upgrade our equipment, especially for video production.
Help SILVIEW.media survive and grow, please donate here, anything helps. Thank you!

! Articles can always be subject of later editing as a way of perfecting them

! Articles can always be subject of later editing as a way of perfecting them

IF YOU’RE READING THIS, YOU’RE PROBABLY TARGETED BY A GOVERNMENT OR TWO. SO I MADE SOMETHING FOR YOU.
SEE DETAILS / ORDER

by on

by Silviu “Silview” Costinescu

You get 1000 Internet points if you find a definition for “criminal” that Bourla doesn’t fit.

this is huge and I thought it will blow up without my help, but it has actually kind of sank under the many smoke grenades launched lately, and even I forgot about it, luckily for social media, where no crime goes forgotten or forgiven.
So it’s my duty to stir this some more, I hope you will share my feeling.

On December 2nd 2021, the BBC published on its website, its popular news app and in the BBC News at One programme a video interview and an accompanying article under the headline ‘Pfizer boss: Annual Covid jabs for years to come’.

The interview by the BBC’s Medical Editor, Fergus Walsh, conducted as a friendly fireside chat, gave Dr. Albert Bourla, the Chairman and CEO of Pfizer, a free pass promotional opportunity that money cannot buy — as the U.K.’s national public service broadcaster, the BBC is usually prohibited from carrying commercial advertising or product placement.

Pfizer CEO Bourla commented on “vaccinating” British children under 12:

  • “There is no doubt in my mind that the benefits, completely are in favor of doing it [vaccinating 5-to-11-year-olds in the UK and Europe].”
  • “Immunizing that age group [children under the age of 11] in the UK and Europe would be a very good idea.”
  • “Covid in schools was thriving.”
  • “So, there was no doubt in my mind that the benefits completely were in favor of doing it.”

The interview was conducted before the vaccine was approved for children between the ages of five and 11 in the UK.

After the interview was published, parent campaign group UsForThem filed a complaint with the Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority (PMCPA). The complaint accused Dr. Bourla of making “disgracefully misleading” comments about vaccinating children and that the comments were “extremely promotional in nature,” and that he violated several clauses of the code of practice by the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry (ABPI).

“There is simply no evidence that healthy schoolchildren in the UK are at significant risk from the SARS COV-2 virus and to imply that they are is disgracefully misleading,” the complaint said.

PMCPA convened a code of practice panel that found that Dr. Bourla had indeed violated the code of practice in a few ways, including failure to present information to the public in a factual and balanced manner, misleading the public, and making claims that cannot be substantiated.

The rulings finding violations were:

The Appeal Board considered that the subsequent strong opinion statements, including ‘So, there was no doubt in my mind that the benefits completely [completely] were in favour of doing it [vaccinating children against Covid-19]’ and ‘I believe it’s a very good idea’ might infer to the ultimate audience, including members of the public, that there was no need to be concerned about potential side-effects of vaccination in healthy children aged 5-11 which was not so. The Appeal Board considered that this implication was misleading and incapable of substantiation. The Appeal Board therefore upheld the Panel’s rulings of breaches of the Code.

The Appeal Board considered that the CEO’s opinion statements, including ‘So there is no doubt in my mind about the benefits completely are in favour of doing it’ might infer to the ultimate audience, including members of the public, that the benefits outweighed the risks when the UK regulatory authorities had not yet made any conclusions in relation to the vaccination of 5 to 11 year olds; no Covid-19 vaccine was licensed in the UK in that age group when the article at issue was published and the Appeal Board therefore upheld the Panel’s rulings of breaches of the Code.

The process took a year to complete. The group published its story here.

The Telegraph reported Pfizer appealed against the findings of the panel and strongly disagreed with UsForThem’s claims that the CEO violated the code of practice. The company argued that Dr. Bourla’s remarks were based on “up-to-date scientific evidence” and they could be proven through “publicly available independent benefit-risk assessments.”

An appeal board upheld that Dr. Bourla misled the public, made claims that were unbalanced, and made unsubstantiated claims.

However, it ruled against claims that Pfizer discredited the industry, encouraged reckless use of a treatment, and did not maintain high standards.

Now, I would also like to bring to your attention this expose that’s too massive to copy/paste here and I don’t even want to deprive independent citizen journalist Anthony Colpo of his well deserved website hits, so please follow these links:

Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla is, By His Own Definition, a Criminal: Part 1

Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla is, By His Own Definition, a Criminal: Part 2

Also these, from myself:

PFIZER on SILVIEW.media

I rest my case.

Other sources I used:
Global Research
CovidLawCast.Com
The Daily Sceptic

To be continued?
Our work and existence, as media and people, is funded solely by our most generous supporters. But we’re not really covering our costs so far, and we’re in dire needs to upgrade our equipment, especially for video production.
Help SILVIEW.media survive and grow, please donate here, anything helps. Thank you!

! Articles can always be subject of later editing as a way of perfecting them

ORDER